ArticleHeart and vessels2017
Prognostic value of diastolic wall strain in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Left Ventricular Stiffness in Adolescents and Young Adults After Arterial Switch Operation for Complete Transposition of the Great Arteries.Pediatric cardiology · 2020Article
- Predictors of responders for low-dose carperitide monotherapy in patients with acute heart failure.Heart and vessels · 2020Article
- Diastolic wall strain as a predictor of age-related cardiovascular events in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.Heart and vessels · 2019Article
- Lower diastolic wall strain is associated with coronary revascularization in patients with stable angina.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2017Article
- Left Ventricular Stiffness in Adolescents and Young Adults with Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction plays a crucial role in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). LV stiffness is a main component of diastolic function, but its role and prognostic value in HFrEF patients remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether diastolic wall strain (DWS) as a noninvasive and simple marker of LV stiffness can predict the prognosis of HFrEF patients who were administrated chronic beta blockade enough. We enrolled 75 HFrEF patients who were administrated chronic beta blockade. We evaluated the echocardiographic parameters and plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) before the induction of beta blockade and also obtained pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) from the right heart catheterization. DWS was obtained from standard M-mode echocardiography as follows: DWS = [(LV posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) at end-systole - LVPWT at end-diastole)/LVPWT] at end-systole. DWS did not correlate with other echocardiographic parameters and PAWP. We defined primary outcome as HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death and followed for 7 years. The incidence rate was higher in low DWS than high DWS patients (p = 0.04). Other echocardiographic parameters could not be significant predictors of HFrEF outcome under the condition of enough beta blocker therapy. In multivariate analysis, DWS was the independent contributor to the event-free time. Impaired LV stiffness evaluated with DWS was associated with worse outcome and DWS might be an independent prognostic factor in HFrEF patients with chronic beta blockade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.