ReviewNeuroImage. Clinical2016
Computational analysis in epilepsy neuroimaging: A survey of features and methods.
Review in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The levels of miR-155 in epilepsy patients: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Volume-inflation registration (INFREG) for morphometric analysis of human focal cortical dysplasia type II.iScience · 2026Article
- Enhanced detection of subtle cortical abnormalities in focal epilepsy using 7 T MRI surface-based models and graph neural networks.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Surfaced-based detection of focal cortical dysplasia using magnetic resonance fingerprinting and machine learning.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Mapping epileptogenic brain using a unified spatial-temporal-spectral source imaging framework.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Global temporal trends and projections of epilepsy in women of childbearing age: insights from the global burden of disease study 2021.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- The use of automated and AI-driven algorithms for the detection of hippocampal sclerosis and focal cortical dysplasia.Epilepsia · 2025Review
- A radiomics nomogram based on multiparametric MRI for diagnosing focal cortical dysplasia and initially identifying laterality.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Review
- Remote effects of temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: Long-term morphological changes after surgical resection.Epilepsia open · 2023Article
- Review of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (ML/AI) for the Pediatric Neurologist.Pediatric neurology · 2023Review
- Surgery for pediatric drug resistant epilepsy: a narrative review of its history, surgical implications, and treatment strategies.Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Multimodal combination of neuroimaging methods for localizing the epileptogenic zone in MR-negative epilepsy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The changing landscape in epilepsy imaging: Unmasking subtle and unique entities.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022Article
- Aerobic glycolysis imaging of epileptic foci during the inter-ictal period.EBioMedicine · 2022Article
- MRI of focal cortical dysplasia.Neuroradiology · 2022Review
- Multicenter Validation of a Deep Learning Detection Algorithm for Focal Cortical Dysplasia.Neurology · 2021Article
- Alterations of structural connectivity and structural co-variance network in focal cortical dysplasia.BMC neurology · 2021Article
- Volumetric glutamate imaging (GluCEST) using 7T MRI can lateralize nonlesional temporal lobe epilepsy: A preliminary study.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Automated fusion of multimodal imaging data for identifying epileptogenic lesions in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epilepsy affects 65 million people worldwide, a third of whom have seizures that are resistant to anti-epileptic medications. Some of these patients may be amenable to surgical therapy or treatment with implantable devices, but this usually requires delineation of discrete structural or functional lesion(s), which is challenging in a large percentage of these patients. Advances in neuroimaging and machine learning allow semi-automated detection of malformations of cortical development (MCDs), a common cause of drug resistant epilepsy. A frequently asked question in the field is what techniques currently exist to assist radiologists in identifying these lesions, especially subtle forms of MCDs such as focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) Type I and low grade glial tumors. Below we introduce some of the common lesions encountered in patients with epilepsy and the common imaging findings that radiologists look for in these patients. We then review and discuss the computational techniques introduced over the past 10 years for quantifying and automatically detecting these imaging findings. Due to large variations in the accuracy and implementation of these studies, specific techniques are traditionally used at individual centers, often guided by local expertise, as well as selection bias introduced by the varying prevalence of specific patient populations in different epilepsy centers. We discuss the need for a multi-institutional study that combines features from different imaging modalities as well as computational techniques to definitively assess the utility of specific automated approaches to epilepsy imaging. We conclude that sharing and comparing these different computational techniques through a common data platform provides an opportunity to rigorously test and compare the accuracy of these tools across different patient populations and geographical locations. We propose that these kinds of tools, quantitative imaging analysis methods and open data platforms for aggregating and sharing data and algorithms, can play a vital role in reducing the cost of care, the risks of invasive treatments, and improve overall outcomes for patients with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.