Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27114900›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage. Clinical2016

Computational analysis in epilepsy neuroimaging: A survey of features and methods.

Lohith G Kini, James C Gee, Brian Litt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mapping epileptogenic brain using a unified spatial-temporal-spectral source imaging framework.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Global temporal trends and projections of epilepsy in women of childbearing age: insights from the global burden of disease study 2021.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The changing landscape in epilepsy imaging: Unmasking subtle and unique entities.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. MRI of focal cortical dysplasia.Neuroradiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lohith G KiniDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, 240 Skirkanich Hall, 210 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6321, USA. Electronic address: lkini@mail.med.upenn.edu.
James C GeeDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Richards - 6th Floor, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6116, USA. Electronic address: gee@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Brian LittDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, 240 Skirkanich Hall, 210 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6321, USA; Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 3 West Gates Bldg., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: littb@mail.med.upenn.edu.

Funding

The International epilepsy electrophysiology databaseU24NS063930 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LITT, BRIAN · 2010 to 2014
$5.6M
Training Program in Neuroengineering and MedicineT32NS091006 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Brian Litt · 2015 to 2026
$4.1M
Virtual Resection to Treat EpilepsyR01NS099348 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, LITT, BRIAN · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS 1-T32-NS-091006-01NINDS NIH HHS 5-U24-NS-063930-05NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099348NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS091006NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS063930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy affects 65 million people worldwide, a third of whom have seizures that are resistant to anti-epileptic medications. Some of these patients may be amenable to surgical therapy or treatment with implantable devices, but this usually requires delineation of discrete structural or functional lesion(s), which is challenging in a large percentage of these patients. Advances in neuroimaging and machine learning allow semi-automated detection of malformations of cortical development (MCDs), a common cause of drug resistant epilepsy. A frequently asked question in the field is what techniques currently exist to assist radiologists in identifying these lesions, especially subtle forms of MCDs such as focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) Type I and low grade glial tumors. Below we introduce some of the common lesions encountered in patients with epilepsy and the common imaging findings that radiologists look for in these patients. We then review and discuss the computational techniques introduced over the past 10 years for quantifying and automatically detecting these imaging findings. Due to large variations in the accuracy and implementation of these studies, specific techniques are traditionally used at individual centers, often guided by local expertise, as well as selection bias introduced by the varying prevalence of specific patient populations in different epilepsy centers. We discuss the need for a multi-institutional study that combines features from different imaging modalities as well as computational techniques to definitively assess the utility of specific automated approaches to epilepsy imaging. We conclude that sharing and comparing these different computational techniques through a common data platform provides an opportunity to rigorously test and compare the accuracy of these tools across different patient populations and geographical locations. We propose that these kinds of tools, quantitative imaging analysis methods and open data platforms for aggregating and sharing data and algorithms, can play a vital role in reducing the cost of care, the risks of invasive treatments, and improve overall outcomes for patients with epilepsy.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingCerebral CortexEpilepsyHumansDRE, drug resistant epilepsyDrug resistant epilepsyDTI, diffusion tensor imagingDWI, diffusion weighted imagingEpilepsyFCD, focal cortical dysplasiaFLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recoveryFocal cortical dysplasiaGM, gray matterGW, gray-white junctionHARDI, high angular resolution diffusion imagingMachine learningMalformations of cortical developmentMEG, magnetoencephalographyMRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy imagingMultimodal neuroimagingPET, positron emission tomographyPNH, periventricular nodular heterotopiaSBM, surface-based morphometryT1W, T1-weighted MRIT2W, T2-weighted MRIVBM, voxel-based morphometryWM, white matter

Identifiers

PMID27114900
PMCPMC4833048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.