Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27114781›Full record

ArticleAsian spine journal2016

Long-Term Objective Physical Activity Measurements using a Wireless Accelerometer Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Surgery.

Kevin Phan, Ralph J Mobbs

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian spine journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04379921 (Improving Spine Surgical Care With Real-Time Objective Patient Tracking Using the Apple Watch), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04379921 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Improving Spine Surgical Care With Real-Time Objective Patient Tracking Using the Apple Watch

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled255ConditionsSpine Disease, Spine Degeneration, Spinal Stenosis, SurgeryArmsApple Watch and App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin PhanNeuro Spine Clinic, Suite 7a, Level 7 Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, Australia.
Ralph J MobbsNeuro Spine Clinic, Suite 7a, Level 7 Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on a case of a patient who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mi-TLIF) with objective physical activity measurements performed preoperatively and postoperatively at up to 12-months using wireless accelerometer technology. In the first postoperative month following surgery, the patient had reduced mobility, taking 2,397 steps over a distance of 1.8 km per day. However, the number of steps taken and distance travelled per day had returned to baseline levels by the second postoperative month. At one-year follow-up, the patient averaged 5,095 steps per day in the month over a distance of 3.8 km; this was a 60% improvement in both steps taken and distance travelled compared to the preoperative status. The use of wireless accelerometers is feasible in obtaining objective physical activity measurements before and after lumbar interbody fusion and may be applicable to other related spinal surgeries as well.

Indexed as

AccelerometerFitbitFusionObjective measurementPhysical activityTransforaminal interbody fusion surgery

Identifiers

PMID27114781
PMCPMC4843077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.