Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27114701›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2016

Functionalized d-form self-assembling peptide hydrogels for bone regeneration.

Bin He, Yunsheng Ou, Ao Zhou, Shuo Chen, Weikang Zhao, Jinqiu Zhao, Hong Li, Yong Zhu, Zenghui Zhao, Dianming Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Materials and Methods.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. New Strategies in Enhancing Spinal Fusion.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bin HeDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yunsheng OuDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Ao ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Shuo ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Weikang ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Jinqiu ZhaoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Hong LiSchool of Physical Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Yong ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Zenghui ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Dianming JiangDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects are very common in orthopedics, and there is great need to develop suitable bone grafts for transplantation in vivo. However, current bone grafts still encounter some limitations, including limited availability, immune rejection, poor osteoinduction and osteoconduction, poor biocompatibility and degradation properties, etc. Self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds have emerged as an important substrate for cell culture and bone regeneration. We report on the structural features (eg, Congo red staining, circular dichroism spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and rheometry assays) and osteogenic ability of d-RADA16-RGD peptide hydrogels (with or without basic fibroblast growth factor) due to the better stability of peptide bonds formed by these peptides compared with those formed by l-form peptides, and use them to fill the femoral condyle defect of Sprague Dawley rat model. The bone morphology change, two-dimensional reconstructions using microcomputed tomography, quantification of the microcomputed tomography analyses as well as histological analyses have demonstrated that RGD-modified d-form peptide scaffolds are able to enhance extensive bone regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone RegenerationFemaleHydrogelsNanofibersOligopeptidesRatsRats, Sprague-Dawleyarginyl-glycyl-aspartic acidHydrogelsOligopeptidesbone defectbone regenerationd-RADA16-RGDfunctionalized d-form self-assembling peptidepeptide hydrogel

Identifiers

PMID27114701
PMCPMC4833366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.