Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27114208›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016

Benzodiazepine and z-hypnotic prescribing for older people in primary care: a cross-sectional population-based study.

Chris F Johnson, Cornelia Frei, Noreen Downes, Stuart A McTaggart, Gazala Akram

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-term benzodiazepine prescriptions in community psychiatry clinics.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2024
    Article
  12. [Private Prescriptions In East And West Germany - A Secondary Data Analysis].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chris F JohnsonMedicine for the Elderly and Care Homes, Pharmacy and Prescribing Support Unit, West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital, Yorkhill, Glasgow.
Cornelia FreiPharmacy Department, Hirslanden Klinik St Anna, Luzern, Switzerland.
Noreen DownesMedicine for the Elderly and Care Homes, Pharmacy and Prescribing Support Unit, West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital, Yorkhill, Glasgow.
Stuart A McTaggartNHS ational Services Scotland, Information Services Division, Edinburgh.
Gazala AkramStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
University of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office NMAHP1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverall prescribing of benzodiazepines and z-hypnotics (B&Zs) has slowly reduced over the past 20 years. However, long-term prescribing still occurs, particularly among older people, and this is at odds with prescribing guidance.

aimTo compare prescribing of B&Zs between care home and non-care home residents ≥65 years old. DESIGN AND

settingCross-sectional population-based study in primary care in Scotland.

methodNational patient-level B&Z prescribing data, for all adults aged ≥65 years, were extracted from the Prescribing Information System (PIS) for the calendar year 2011. The PIS gives access to data for all NHS prescriptions dispensed in primary care in Scotland. Data were stratified by health board, residential status, sex, and age (65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years). To minimise disclosure risk, data from smaller health boards were amalgamated according to geography, thereby reducing the number from 14 to 10 areas.

resultsA total of 17% (n = 879 492) of the Scottish population were aged ≥65 years, of which 3.7% (n = 32 368) were care home residents. In total, 12.1% (n = 106 412) of older people were prescribed one or more B&Z: 5.9% an anxiolytic, 7.5% a hypnotic, and 1.3% were prescribed both. B&Zs were prescribed to 28.4% (9199) of care home and 11.5% (97 213) of non-care home residents (relative risk = 2.88, 95% CI = 2.82 to 2.95, P<0.001). Estimated annual B&Z exposure reduced with increasing age of care home residents, whereas non-care home residents' exposure increased with age.

conclusionB&Zs were commonly prescribed for older people, with care home residents approximately three times more likely to be prescribed B&Zs than non-care home residents. However, overall B&Z exposure among non-care home residents was found to rise with increasing age.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnti-Anxiety AgentsAnxietyBenzodiazepinesCross-Sectional StudiesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesInappropriate PrescribingMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Residential FacilitiesAnti-Anxiety AgentsBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitorsanxiolyticsbenzodiazepinescare homesfamily practicehypnoticsolder people

Identifiers

PMID27114208
PMCPMC4871306
OpenAlexW2343853645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.