Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27113679›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology review2016

A systematic review of depression psychotherapies among Latinos.

Anahí Collado, Aaron C Lim, Laura MacPherson

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cultural adaptation of theInternet interventions · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anahí ColladoEmory University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 12 Executive Park Drive NE, suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30329, United States. Electronic address: anahi.collado@emory.edu.
Aaron C LimUniversity of California - Los Angeles, Department of Psychology, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States. Electronic address: aaron.c.lim@gmail.com.
Laura MacPhersonUniversity of Maryland - College Park, Department of Psychology, 2103 Cole Activities Fieldhouse, College Park, MD 20742, United States. Electronic address: lmacpher@umd.edu.
Emory University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Evaluating Behavioral Activation Efficacy in Depressed Spanish-Speaking LatinosF31MH098512 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI COLLADO, ANAHI · 2013 to 2014
$72k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH098512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, the literature has reported persistent treatment disparities among depressed Latinos. Fortunately, treatment development and evaluation in this underserved population has expanded in recent years. This review summarizes outcomes across 36 unique depression treatment studies that reported treatment outcomes for Latinos. Results indicated that there was significant variability in the quality of RCT and type/number of cultural adaptations. The review suggested that there might a relation between cultural adaptations with treatment outcomes; future studies are warranted to confirm this association. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy was the most evaluated treatment (CBT; n=18, 50% of all evaluations), followed by Problem Solving Therapy (PST; n=4), Interpersonal Therapy (IPT; n=4), and Behavioral Activation (BA; n=3). CBT seems to fare better when compared to usual care, but not when compared to a contact-time matched control condition or active treatment. There is growing support for PST and IPT as efficacious depression interventions among Latinos. IPT shows particularly positive results for perinatal depression. BA warrants additional examination in RCT. Although scarce, telephone and in-home counseling have shown efficacy in reducing depression and increasing retention. Promotora-assisted trials require formal assessment. Limitations and future directions of the depression psychotherapy research among Latinos are discussed.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHispanic or LatinoHumansMajor Depressive DisorderPsychotherapyTreatment OutcomeDepressionEmpirically supported treatmentsLatinosPsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27113679
PMCPMC4860901
OpenAlexW2330281015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.