Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27113575›Full record

ReviewImplementation science : IS2016

Using intervention mapping to develop a theory-driven, group-based complex intervention to support self-management of osteoarthritis and low back pain (SOLAS).

Deirdre A Hurley, Laura Currie Murphy, David Hayes, Amanda M Hall, Elaine Toomey, Suzanne M McDonough, Chris Lonsdale, Nicola E Walsh, Suzanne Guerin, James Matthews

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Using self-determination theory in research and evaluation in primary care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Deirdre A HurleyUCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland. deirdre.hurleyosing@ucd.ie.
Laura Currie MurphyBreast-Predict-Collaborative Cancer Research Centre, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
David HayesUCD School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Amanda M HallThe George Institute for Global Health, Oxford Martin School, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Elaine ToomeyUCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Suzanne M McDonoughInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Jordanstown Campus, Ulster University, Antrim, BT37 0QB, UK.
Chris LonsdaleInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, 25A Barker Road, Strathfield, NSW 2135, Australia.
Nicola E WalshFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Glenside Campus, University of the West of England, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK.
Suzanne GuerinUCD School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
James MatthewsUCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IEAustralian Catholic University · AUTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of the West of England · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Medical Research Council framework provides a useful general approach to designing and evaluating complex interventions, but does not provide detailed guidance on how to do this and there is little evidence of how this framework is applied in practice. This study describes the use of intervention mapping (IM) in the design of a theory-driven, group-based complex intervention to support self-management (SM) of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and chronic low back pain (CLBP) in Ireland's primary care health system.

methodsThe six steps of the IM protocol were systematically applied to develop the self-management of osteoarthritis and low back pain through activity and skills (SOLAS) intervention through adaptation of the Facilitating Activity and Self-management in Arthritis (FASA) intervention. A needs assessment including literature reviews, interviews with patients and physiotherapists and resource evaluation was completed to identify the programme goals, determinants of SM behaviour, consolidated definition of SM and required adaptations to FASA to meet health service and patient needs and the evidence. The resultant SOLAS intervention behavioural outcomes, performance and change objectives were specified and practical application methods selected, followed by organised programme, adoption, implementation and evaluation plans underpinned by behaviour change theory.

resultsThe SOLAS intervention consists of six weekly sessions of 90-min education and exercise designed to increase participants' physical activity level and use of evidence-based SM strategies (i.e. pain self-management, pain coping, healthy eating for weight management and specific exercise) through targeting of individual determinants of SM behaviour (knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, fear, catastrophizing, motivation, behavioural regulation), delivered by a trained physiotherapist to groups of up to eight individuals using a needs supportive interpersonal style based on self-determination theory. Strategies to support SOLAS intervention adoption and implementation included a consensus building workshop with physiotherapy stakeholders, development of a physiotherapist training programme and a pilot trial with physiotherapist and patient feedback.

conclusionsThe SOLAS intervention is currently being evaluated in a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial. IM is a time-intensive collaborative process, but the range of methods and resultant high level of transparency is invaluable and allows replication by future complex intervention and trial developers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritisPain ManagementSelf CareYoung AdultBehaviour change interventionComplex group interventionIntervention mappingLow back painMixed methodsOsteoarthritisPatient-public involvementPhysical activityPhysiotherapistsSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID27113575
PMCPMC4845501
OpenAlexW2342506855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.