ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2016
Time-to-Surgery and Survival Outcomes in Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multi-Institutional Evaluation.
Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Impact of time to ablation on survival outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases: an inverse probability-weighted cohort study.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- One-year survival rate and factors associated with stage IV colorectal cancer at National General Hospital in Indonesia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Perioperative and recurrence-free survival outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging: an inverse probability treatment weighted analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- CEBPB-mediated upregulation of SERPINA1 promotes colorectal cancer progression by enhancing STAT3 signaling.Cell death discovery · 2024Article
- Circular RNA circSP5 promotes liver metastasis of colorectal cancer via SP5-mediated BAMBI transcription.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Article
- Metastasis-Directed Local Therapy of Hepatic Oligometastasis from Colorectal Cancer and Future Perspective in Radiation Therapy.Cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- Successful multidisciplinary therapy for a patient with liver metastasis from ascending colon adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Simple systemic index associated with oxaliplatin-induced liver damage can be a novel biomarker to predict prognosis after resection of colorectal liver metastasis.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2022Article
- Article
- Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative-intent resection of colorectal liver metastases.International journal of cancer · 2022Article
- Nomogram Incorporating Preoperative Testing Markers for the prediction of Early Recurrence for Colorectal Liver Metastases with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Hepatectomy.Journal of Cancer · 2022Article
- Effect of Time to Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases on Survival.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2021Article
- Circular RNA profiling identifies circ102049 as a key regulator of colorectal liver metastasis.Molecular oncology · 2021Article
- Strategies for the delay of surgery in the management of resectable hepatobiliary malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2020Review
- Hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Review
- Long-term Survival in Patients Treated with a Robotic Radiosurgical Device for Liver Metastases.Cancer research and treatment · 2019Article
- Assessing resectability of colorectal liver metastases: How do different subspecialties interpret the same data?Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2018Article
- The New Era of Transplant Oncology: Liver Transplantation for Nonresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018Review
- Preoperative peripheral blood neutrophil count predicts long-term outcomes following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases.Oncology letters · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is associated with improved survival; however, the impact of time to resection on survival is unknown. The current multi-institutional study sought to evaluate the influence of time from diagnosis (Dx) to resection (Rx) on survival outcomes among patients with resectable, metachronous CRLM and to compare practice patterns across hospitals. STUDY
designMedical records of patients with ≤4 metachronous CRLM treated with surgery were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. Time from Dx to Rx was analyzed as a continuous variable and also dichotomized into 2 groups (group 1: Dx to Rx <3 months and group 2: Dx to Rx ≥3 months) for additional analysis. Survival time distributions after resection were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Between-group univariate comparisons were based on the log-rank test and multivariable analysis was done using Cox proportional hazards model.
resultsFrom 2000 to 2010, six hundred and twenty-six patients were identified. Type of initial referral (p < 0.0001) and use of neoadjuvant (p = 0.04) and/or adjuvant (p < 0.0001) chemotherapy were significantly different among hospitals. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 108) and those with unresectable disease at laparotomy (n = 5) were excluded from final evaluation. Median overall survival and recurrence-free survival were 74 months (range 63.8 to 84.2 months) and 29 months (range 23.9 to 34.1 months), respectively. For the entire cohort, longer time from Dx to Rx was independently associated with shorter overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.18; p < 0.0001), but not recurrence-free survival. Median overall survival for group 1 was 76 months (range 62.0 to 89.2 months) vs 58 months (range 34.3 to 81.7 months) in group 2 (p = 0.10). Among patients with available data pertaining to adjuvant chemotherapy (N = 457; 318 treated and 139 untreated), overall survival (87 months [range 71.2 to 102.8 months] vs 48 months [range 25.3 to 70.7 months]; p <0.0001), and recurrence-free survival (33 months [range 25.3 to 40.7 months] vs 22 months [range 14.5 to 29.5 months]; p = 0.05) were improved significantly.
conclusionsIn select patients undergoing initial resection for CRLM, longer time from Dx to Rx is independently associated with worse overall survival. In addition, despite uniform disease characteristics, practice patterns related to definitely resectable CRLM vary significantly across hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.