Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27113512›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2016

Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Number of Nodes Examined and Optimal Lymph Node Prognostic Scheme.

Fabio Bagante, Thuy Tran, Gaya Spolverato, Andrea Ruzzenente, Stefan Buttner, Cecilia G Ethun, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Simone Conci, Kamran Idrees, Chelsea A Isom and 17 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Changing concepts in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resections and surgery.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of Four Lymph Node Classifications for the Prediction of Survival in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

Fabio BaganteDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Thuy TranDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Gaya SpolveratoDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Andrea RuzzenenteDepartment of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Stefan ButtnerDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Cecilia G EthunDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Simone ConciDepartment of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Kamran IdreesDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Chelsea A IsomDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Ryan C FieldsDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Bradley KrasnickDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Sharon M WeberDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Ahmed SalemDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Robert C G MartinDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
Charles ScogginsDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
Perry ShenDepartment of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
Harveshp D MogalDepartment of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
Carl SchmidtDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
Eliza BealDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
Ioannis HatzarasDepartment of Surgery, New York University, New York, NY.
Gerardo VitielloDepartment of Surgery, New York University, New York, NY.
Jan N M IJzermansDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Shishir K MaithelDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
George PoultsidesDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Alfredo GuglielmiDepartment of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Timothy M PawlikDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: tpawlik1@jhmi.edu.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLJohns Hopkins Hospital · USUniversity of Verona · ITEmory University · USNew York University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USWake Forest University · USWashington University in St. Louis · USStanford Medicine · USStanford University · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
Advanced Research Training in Immunology for Surgery Trainees (ARTIST)T32AI106704 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GINNY L BUMGARDNER, Jon R Wisler · 2014 to 2026
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI106704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of routine lymphadenectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is still controversial and no study has defined the minimum number of lymph nodes examined (TNLE). We sought to assess the prognostic performance of American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (7(th) edition) N stage, lymph node ratio, and log odds (LODDS; logarithm of the ratio between metastatic and nonmetastatic nodes) in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and identify the optimal TNLE to accurately stage patients.

methodsA multi-institutional database was queried to identify 437 patients who underwent hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 1995 and 2014. The prognostic abilities of the lymph node staging systems were assessed using the Harrell's c-index. A Bayesian model was developed to identify the minimum TNLE.

resultsOne hundred and fifty-eight (36.2%) patients had lymph node metastasis. Median TNLE was 3 (interquartile range, 1 to 7). The LODDS had a slightly better prognostic performance than lymph node ratio and American Joint Committee on Cancer, in particular among patients with <4 TNLE (c-index = 0.568). For 2 TNLE, the Bayesian model showed a poor discriminatory ability to distinguish patients with favorable and poor prognosis. When TNLE was >2, the hazard ratio for N1 patients was statistically significant and the hazard ratio for N1 patients increased from 1.51 with 4 TNLE to 2.10 with 10 TNLE. Although the 5-year overall survival of N1 patients was only slightly affected by TNLE, the 5-year overall survival of N0 patients increased significantly with TNLE.

conclusionsPerihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing radical resection should ideally have at least 4 lymph nodes harvested to be accurately staged. In addition, although LODDS performed better at determining prognosis among patients with <4 TNLE, both lymph node ratio and LODDS outperformed compared with American Joint Committee on Cancer N stage among patients with ≥4 TNLE.

Indexed as

AgedBayes TheoremBile Duct NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualEuropeFemaleHepatectomyHumansKlatskin TumorLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID27113512
PMCPMC5450030
OpenAlexW2287036329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.