Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27113380›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2016

Death Scene Investigation and Autopsy Practices in Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths.

Alexa B Erck Lambert, Sharyn E Parks, Lena Camperlengo, Carri Cottengim, Rebecca L Anderson, Theresa M Covington, Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Sleep-Related Infant Deaths in Japan.JAMA network open · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of a Risk Score to Predict Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexa B Erck LambertDB Consulting Group, Inc, Silver Spring, MD. Electronic address: xwp5@cdc.gov.
Sharyn E ParksDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Lena CamperlengoDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Carri CottengimDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Rebecca L AndersonDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Theresa M CovingtonNational Center for the Review and Prevention of Child Death, Michigan Public Health Institute, Okemos, MI.
Carrie K Shapiro-MendozaDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USBH Consulting (Ireland) · IEMichigan Public Health Institute · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe and compare sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) investigations among states participating in the SUID Case Registry from 2010 through 2012. STUDY

designWe analyzed observational data from 770 SUID cases identified and entered into the National Child Death Review Case Reporting System. We examined data on autopsy and death scene investigation (DSI) components, including key information about the infant sleep environment. We calculated the percentage of components that were complete, incomplete, and missing/unknown.

resultsMost cases (98%) had a DSI. The DSI components most frequently reported as done were the narrative description of the circumstances (90%; range, 85%-99%), and witness interviews (88%, range, 85%-98%). Critical information about 10 infant sleep environment components was available for 85% of cases for all states combined. All 770 cases had an autopsy performed. The autopsy components most frequently reported as done were histology, microbiology, and other pathology (98%; range, 94%-100%) and toxicology (97%; range, 94%-100%).

conclusionsThis study serves as a baseline to understand the scope of infant death investigations in selected states. Standardized and comprehensive DSI and autopsy practices across jurisdictions and states may increase knowledge about SUID etiology and also lead to an improved understanding of the cause-specific SUID risk and protective factors. Additionally, these results demonstrate practices in the field showing what is feasible in these select states. We encourage pediatricians, forensic pathologists, and other medicolegal experts to use these findings to inform system changes and improvements in DSI and autopsy practices and SUID prevention efforts.

Indexed as

AutopsyCause of DeathHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSleepSudden Infant DeathUnited Statesautopsychild death reviewcoronersdeath scene investigationforensic pathologistsinfant mortalitymedical examinerssudden infant death syndromesurveillance

Identifiers

PMID27113380
PMCPMC5063238
OpenAlexW2339262648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.