Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27113253›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2016

ALS: Recent Developments from Genetics Studies.

Martine Therrien, Patrick A Dion, Guy A Rouleau

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Unraveling Molecular Targets for Neurodegenerative Diseases ThroughInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A novel S379A TARDBP mutation associated to late-onset sporadic ALS.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martine TherrienUniversity of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Patrick A DionMontreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Guy A RouleauMontreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. guy.rouleau@mcgill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal disorder that is characterized by a progressive degeneration of the upper and lower motor neurons. Most cases appear to be sporadic, but 5-10 % of cases have a family history of the disease. High-throughput DNA sequencing and related genomic capture tools are methodological advances which have rapidly contributed to an acceleration in the discovery of genetic risk factors for both familial and sporadic ALS. It is interesting to note that as the number of ALS genes grows, many of the proteins they encode are in shared intracellular processes. This review will summarize some of the recent advances and gene discovery made in ALS.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAnimalsC9orf72 ProteinHumansMitochondrial ProteinsMutationNuclear Matrix-Associated ProteinsProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA-Binding ProteinsC9orf72 ProteinC9orf72 protein, humanCHCHD10 protein, humanMATR3 protein, humanMitochondrial ProteinsNuclear Matrix-Associated ProteinsProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA-Binding ProteinsTBK1 protein, humanALSGeneticsMotor neuron diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.