Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27113241›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Improving the management of multimorbidity in general practice: protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial (The 3D Study).

Mei-See Man, Katherine Chaplin, Cindy Mann, Peter Bower, Sara Brookes, Bridie Fitzpatrick, Bruce Guthrie, Alison Shaw, Sandra Hollinghurst, Stewart Mercer and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Efficiency versus thoroughness in medication review: a qualitative interview study in UK primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  20. A computer template to enhance patient-centredness in multimorbidity reviews: a qualitative evaluation in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mei-See ManCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4948-5670
Katherine ChaplinCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Cindy MannCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1256-1820
Peter BowerCentre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sara BrookesCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Bridie FitzpatrickInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Bruce GuthrieQuality, Safety and Informatics Research Group, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Alison ShawCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sandra HollinghurstCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-3117
Stewart MercerInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Imran RafiClinical Innovation and Research, Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK.
Joanna ThornCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4378-3960

Funding

Department of Health 12/130/15Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn increasing number of people are living with multimorbidity. The evidence base for how best to manage these patients is weak. Current clinical guidelines generally focus on single conditions, which may not reflect the needs of patients with multimorbidity. The aim of the 3D study is to develop, implement and evaluate an intervention to improve the management of patients with multimorbidity in general practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. 32 general practices around Bristol, Greater Manchester and Glasgow will be randomised to receive either the '3D intervention' or usual care. 3D is a complex intervention including components affecting practice organisation, the conduct of patient reviews, integration with secondary care and measures to promote change in practice organisation. Changes include improving continuity of care and replacing reviews of each disease with patient-centred reviews with a focus on patients' quality of life, mental health and polypharmacy. We aim to recruit 1383 patients who have 3 or more chronic conditions. This provides 90% power at 5% significance level to detect an effect size of 0.27 SDs in the primary outcome, which is health-related quality of life at 15 months using the EQ-5D-5L. Secondary outcome measures assess patient centredness, illness burden and treatment burden. The primary analysis will be a multilevel regression model adjusted for baseline, stratification/minimisation, clustering and important co-variables. Nested process evaluation will assess implementation, mechanisms of effectiveness and interaction of the intervention with local context. Economic analysis of cost-consequences and cost-effectiveness will be based on quality-adjusted life years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has approval from South-West (Frenchay) National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee (14/SW/0011). Findings will be disseminated via final report, peer-reviewed publications and guidance to healthcare professionals, commissioners and policymakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN06180958; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseComorbidityDisease ManagementGeneral PracticeQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisCost of IllnessFemaleHumansMalePatient-Centered CareResearch DesignUnited KingdomChronic diseaseco-morbidityFamily PracticeMultimorbidityPatient centred care

Identifiers

PMID27113241
PMCPMC4854003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.