Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27113237›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Clinical validation of hrHPV testing on vaginal and urine self-samples in primary cervical screening (cross-sectional results from the Papillomavirus Dumfries and Galloway-PaVDaG study).

Grazyna Stanczuk, Gwendoline Baxter, Heather Currie, James Lawrence, Kate Cuschieri, Allan Wilson, Marc Arbyn

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03409471 (Human Papillomavirus), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03409471 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Human Papillomavirus(HPV) Test of Urine and Self Collected Vaginal Samples for Cervical Cancer Screening Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKorea University Guro HospitalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled300ConditionsASC-US, LSILArmsFlocked Swab, Cervical Brush, HPV assay
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Urine human papillomavirus testing for cervical screening in a UK general screening population: a diagnostic test accuracy study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Grazyna StanczukResearch and Development Support Unit, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries, UK Global Health Academy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Gwendoline BaxterResearch and Development Support Unit, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-081X
Heather CurrieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries, UK.
James LawrenceResearch and Development Support Unit, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries, UK.
Kate CuschieriScottish HPV Reference Laboratory, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Allan WilsonDepartment of Pathology, Monklands Hospital, Airdrie, UK.
Marc ArbynUnit of Cancer Epidemiology/Belgian Cancer Centre, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium.
Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBInstitut Scientifique de Santé Publique · BEMonklands Hospital · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPapillomavirus Dumfries and Galloway (PaVDaG) assessed the performance of a high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) PCR-based assay to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) in self-collected vaginal and urine samples.

settingWomen attending routine cervical screening in primary care.

participants5318 women aged 20-60 years provided self-collected random urine and vaginal samples for hrHPV testing and a clinician-collected liquid-based cytology (LBC) sample for cytology and hrHPV testing.

interventionsHrHPV testing. All samples were tested for hrHPV using the PCR-based cobas 4800 assay. Colposcopy was offered to women with high-grade or repeated borderline/low-grade cytological abnormalities; also to those who were LBC negative but hrHPV 16/18 positive. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The self-tests' absolute sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ were assessed on all biospecimens; also, their relative sensitivity and specificity compared with clinician-taken samples. Interlaboratory and intralaboratory performance of the hrHPV assay in self-collected samples was also established.

resultsHrHPV prevalence was 14.7%, 16.6% and 11.6% in cervical, vaginal and urine samples, respectively. Sensitivity for detecting CIN2+ was 97.7% (95% to 100%), 94.6% (90.7% to 98.5%) and 63.1% (54.6% to 71.7%) for cervical, vaginal and urine hrHPV detection, respectively. The corresponding specificities were 87.3% (86.4% to 88.2%), 85.4% (84.4% to 86.3%) and 89.8% (89.0% to 90.7%). There was a 38% (24% to 57%) higher HPV detection rate in vaginal self-samples from women over 50 years compared with those ≤29 years. Relative sensitivity and specificity of hrHPV positivity for the detection of CIN2+ in vaginal versus cervical samples were 0.97 (0.94 to 1.00) and 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99); urine versus cervical comparisons were 0.53 (0.42 to 0.67) and 1.03 (1.02 to 1.04). The intralaboratory and interlaboratory agreement for hrHPV positivity in self-samples was high (κ values 0.98 (0.96 to 0.99) and 0.94 (0.92 to 0.97) for vaginal samples and 0.95 (0.93 to 0.98) and 0.90 (0.87 to 0.94) for urine samples).

conclusionsThe sensitivity of self-collected vaginal samples for the detection of CIN2+ was similar to that of cervical samples and justifies consideration of this sample for primary screening.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHuman Papillomavirus DNA TestsCervix UteriFemaleHumansPapillomavirus InfectionsPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsScotlandSpecimen HandlingUrinalysisUterine Cervical DysplasiaVaginaPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTHSEXUAL MEDICINEVIROLOGY

Identifiers

PMID27113237
PMCPMC4854001
OpenAlexW2343373565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.