Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27112634›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2016

The concerted impact of domestication and transposon insertions on methylation patterns between dogs and grey wolves.

Ilana Janowitz Koch, Michelle M Clark, Michael J Thompson, Kerry A Deere-Machemer, Jun Wang, Lionel Duarte, Gitanjali E Gnanadesikan, Eskender L McCoy, Liudmilla Rubbi, Daniel R Stahler and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic advancements in goat breeding: enhancing productivity, disease resistance, and sustainability in India's rural economy.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ilana Janowitz KochEcology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Michelle M ClarkDepartment of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Michael J ThompsonMolecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Kerry A Deere-MachemerEcology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Jun WangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48085, USA.
Lionel DuarteDepartment of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Gitanjali E GnanadesikanEcology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Eskender L McCoyYale School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Liudmilla RubbiMolecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Daniel R StahlerYellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, WY, 82190, USA.
Matteo PellegriniMolecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Elaine A OstranderNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Robert K WayneEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Janet S SinsheimerDepartment of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Bridgett M vonHoldtEcology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USPrinceton University · USNational Institutes of Health · USWayne State University · USYale University · USYellowstone National Park

Funding

Comparative Mammalian GenomicsZIAHG200377 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI OSTRANDER, ELAINE · 2012 to 2025
$24.8M
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR GENE MAPPINGR01GM053275 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LANGE, KENNETH L · 1995 to 2019
$9.3M
Training Grant in Genomic Analysis and InterpretationT32HG002536 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Valerie A Arboleda, Harold Pimentel · 2002 to 2026
$8.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002536NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of domestication can exert intense trait-targeted selection on genes and regulatory regions. Specifically, rapid shifts in the structure and sequence of genomic regulatory elements could provide an explanation for the extensive, and sometimes extreme, variation in phenotypic traits observed in domesticated species. Here, we explored methylation differences from >24 000 cytosines distributed across the genomes of the domesticated dog (Canis familiaris) and the grey wolf (Canis lupus). PCA and model-based cluster analyses identified two primary groups, domestic vs. wild canids. A scan for significantly differentially methylated sites (DMSs) revealed species-specific patterns at 68 sites after correcting for cell heterogeneity, with weak yet significant hypermethylation typical of purebred dogs when compared to wolves (59% and 58%, P < 0.05, respectively). Additionally, methylation patterns at eight genes significantly deviated from neutrality, with similar trends of hypermethylation in purebred dogs. The majority (>66%) of differentially methylated regions contained or were associated with repetitive elements, indicative of a genotype-mediated trend. However, DMSs were also often linked to functionally relevant genes (e.g. neurotransmitters). Finally, we utilized known genealogical relationships among Yellowstone wolves to survey transmission stability of methylation marks, from which we found a substantial fraction that demonstrated high heritability (both H(2) and h(2 ) > 0.99). These analyses provide a unique epigenetic insight into the molecular consequences of recent selection and radiation of our most ancient domesticated companion, the dog. These findings suggest selection has acted on methylation patterns, providing a new genomic perspective on phenotypic diversification in domesticated species.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationDNA Transposable ElementsDomesticationAnimalsDogsEvolution, MolecularInheritance PatternsPedigreePolymorphism, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityWolvesDNA Transposable Elementscaniddomesticationgenome regulationmethylation

Identifiers

PMID27112634
PMCPMC4849173
OpenAlexW2263792923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.