Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27112592›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2017

Concussion Care Practices and Utilization of Evidence-Based Guidelines in the Evaluation and Management of Concussion: A Survey of New England Emergency Departments.

Robert A Stern, Daniel Seichepine, Christine Tschoe, Nathan G Fritts, Michael L Alosco, Oren Berkowitz, Peter Burke, Jonathan Howland, Jonathan Olshaker, Robert C Cantu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Heads up for concussion, what do emergency physicians know? A scoping review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Variability in the indication of brain CT scan after mild traumatic brain injury. A transnational survey.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Robert A Stern1 Boston University Alzheimer's Disease and CTE Center; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel Seichepine2 Boston University Alzheimer's Disease and CTE Center , Boston, Massachusetts.
Christine Tschoe3 Department of Neurosurgery, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts.
Nathan G Fritts2 Boston University Alzheimer's Disease and CTE Center , Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael L Alosco4 Boston University Alzheimer's Disease and CTE Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts.
Oren Berkowitz5 Departments of Neurosurgery and Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts.
Peter Burke6 Section of Acute Care & Trauma Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts.
Jonathan Howland7 Injury Prevention Center, Boston Medical Center; Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts.
Jonathan Olshaker8 Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine; Department of Emergency Medicine , Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert C Cantu9 Boston University Alzheimer's Disease and CTE Center, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts.
Christine M Baugh10 Boston University Alzheimer's Disease and CTE Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Interfaculty Initiative in Health Policy, Harvard University , Cambridge, Massachusetts.
James W Holsapple3 Department of Neurosurgery, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Neuropathology CoreP30AG013846 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KOWALL, NEIL W. · 1996 to 2020
$29.1M
Health Policy Training Program: Promoting Outcomes, Quality, Equity and Diffusion of AdvancesT32MH019733 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI Benjamin Le Cook, Haiden A Huskamp · 1993 to 2026
$7.0M
Alzheimer's disease translational research trainingT32AG036697 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KOWALL, NEIL W. · 2011 to 2015
$1.1M
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Biomarker for Chronic Traumatic EncephalopathyF32NS096803 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ALOSCO, MICHAEL · 2016 to 2017
$118k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013846NIA NIH HHS T32 AG036697NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019733NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS096803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines can facilitate proper evaluation and management of concussions in the emergency department (ED), often the initial and primary point of contact for concussion care. There is no universally adopted set of guidelines for concussion management, and extant evidence suggests that there may be variability in concussion care practices and limited application of clinical practice guidelines in the ED. This study surveyed EDs throughout New England to examine current practices of concussion care and utilization of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in the evaluation and management of concussions. In 2013, a 32-item online survey was e-mailed to 149/168 EDs throughout New England (Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine). Respondents included senior administrators asked to report on their EDs use of clinical practice guidelines, neuroimaging decision-making, and discharge instructions for concussion management. Of the 72/78 respondents included, 35% reported absence of clinical practice guidelines, and 57% reported inconsistency in the type of guidelines used. Practitioner preference guided neuroimaging decision-making for 57%. Although 94% provided written discharge instructions, there was inconsistency in the recommended time frame for follow-up care (13% provided no specific time frame), the referral specialist to be seen (25% did not recommend any specialist), and return to activity instructions were inconsistent. There is much variability in concussion care practices and application of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in the evaluation and management of concussions in New England EDs. Knowledge translational efforts will be critical to improve concussion management in the ED setting.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionEmergency Service, HospitalEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNew EnglandPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'clinical practice guidelinesconcussionemergency departmentNew Englandtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID27112592
PMCPMC5314982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.