Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27112299›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

Mice Develop Efficient Strategies for Foraging and Navigation Using Complex Natural Stimuli.

David H Gire, Vikrant Kapoor, Annie Arrighi-Allisan, Agnese Seminara, Venkatesh N Murthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Distinct brain regions map olfactory and visual spaces.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David H GireDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: dhgire@uw.edu.
Vikrant KapoorDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Annie Arrighi-AllisanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Agnese SeminaraCNRS, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Condensée, UMR7336, Parc Valrose, Nice 06108, France.
Venkatesh N MurthyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: vnmurthy@fas.harvard.edu.

Funding

Optogenetic studies of mouse olfactionR01DC011291 · NIDCD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MURTHY, VENKATESH N · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Neural circuit mechanisms of odor localization in miceR00DC013305 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GIRE, DAVID HENRY · 2015 to 2018
$796k
Neural circuit mechanisms of odor localization in miceK99DC013305 · NIDCD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI GIRE, DAVID HENRY · 2013 to 2014
$230k
NIDCD NIH HHS K99 DC013305NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC013305NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to shift between multiple decision-making strategies during natural behavior allows animals to strike a balance between flexibility and efficiency. We investigated odor-guided navigation by mice to understand how decision-making strategies are balanced during a complex natural behavior. Mice navigated to odor sources in an open arena using naturally fluctuating airborne odor cues as their positions were recorded precisely in real time. When mice had limited prior experience of source locations, their search behavior was consistent with a gradient ascent algorithm that utilized directional cues in the plume to navigate to the odor source. Gradient climbing was effective because the arena size allowed animals to conduct their search mainly within the odor plume, with frequent odor contacts. With increased experience, mice shifted their strategy from this flexible, sensory-driven search behavior to a more efficient and stereotyped foraging approach that varied little in response to odor plumes. This study demonstrates that mice use prior knowledge to adaptively balance flexibility and efficiency during complex behavior guided by dynamic natural stimuli.

Indexed as

Appetitive BehaviorCuesOdorantsSmellSpatial NavigationAnimalsFeeding BehaviorMiceMice, Inbred C57BL

Identifiers

PMID27112299
PMCPMC4951102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.