ArticleBMC health services research2016
Transitioning from cytology-based screening to HPV-based screening at longer intervals: implications for resource use.
Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized Implementation of a Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing-based Cervical Cancer Screening Protocol for Women 34 to 69 Years in Norway.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022Trial
- Psychological effect of cervical cancer screening when changing primary screening method from cytology to high-risk human papilloma virus testing.International journal of cancer · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Long-Term Regional Pathology-Detection Trends in High-Grade Cervical Lesions and Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Among Women Aged 40-69 Years in Northern Norway, 1998-2025.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Human papillomavirus infection and screening strategies.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Correlates of intention-to-attend and confirmed cervical screening attendance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: Findings from Compass-PLUS, a prospective cohort study.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- Divergent effects of switching from cytology to HPV-based screening in the Nordic countries.European journal of public health · 2024Article
- Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cervical screening, triage and treatment strategies for women in the general population.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- The early impacts of primary HPV cervical screening implementation in Australia on the pathology sector: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Implementation of Australia's primary human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical screening program: The STakeholders Opinions of Renewal Implementation and Experiences Study.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Managing an extension of screening intervals: Avoiding boom and bust in health care workloads.International journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Article
- Knowledge on human papilloma virus and experience of getting positive results: a qualitative study among women in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- National experience in the first two years of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical screening in an HPV vaccinated population in Australia: observational study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Observational
- Introducing human papillomavirus (HPV) primary testing in the age of HPV vaccination: projected impact on colposcopy services in Wales.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2021Article
- Cervical screening in Western Kazakhstan: Liquid-based cytology 'Cell Scan' versus azur-eosin staining.Journal of medical screening · 2020Article
- Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.JAMA network open · 2019Article
- HPV Types Distribution in General Female Population and in Women Diagnosed with Cervical Cancer Across Western KazakhstanAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Projected future impact of HPV vaccination and primary HPV screening on cervical cancer rates from 2017-2035: Example from Australia.PloS one · 2018Article
- Choosing wisely: a model-based analysis evaluating the trade-offs in cancer benefit and diagnostic referrals among alternative HPV testing strategies in Norway.British journal of cancer · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing a recent major review of cervical screening, from 2017 Australia will transition from two-yearly cytology-based screening to five-yearly primary HPV screening, with partial genotyping and direct referral for HPV 16/18 and LBC triage for other oncogenic types. Switching to a longer screening interval will result in transitional fluctuations for volumes of tests before a 'steady state' is reached for the new test volumes. This study aimed to quantify the impact of this transition on year-to-year volumes of screening and follow-up tests and procedures.
methodsNumber of women screened and test volumes from 2015 to 2032 were estimated via a detailed simulation model which explicitly modelled varying screening and HPV vaccination exposure in individual birth cohorts, and fully incorporated how a relatively rapid screening program switch in 2017 would affect both women attending for routine screening and those in surveillance following an abnormality.
resultsNumbers of women screened and HPV tests are predicted to fluctuate in the first screening rounds as a result of the transition to a longer screening interval (mean women screened and HPV tests 1.4 million in the first 5-year period, year-to-year fluctuation > +/-50%; mean 1.5 million women/HPV tests in third 5-year period, fluctuation approximately +/-25%). The extent to which this fluctuation was predicted to carry through to secondary tests/procedures was less (fluctuations of +25%/-31% in first 5-year period; decreasing to +8%/-10% by third round). HPV vaccination is predicted to counteract increases in high grade cytology results, colposcopies and precancer treatments which would otherwise occur due to population increases. Precancer treatments are predicted to drop below 2015 levels within the first few years of program switchover. Mean colposcopy volumes are predicted to be similar to 2015 levels by the third round of HPV-based screening, and also be 25-40% lower than would have occurred in the absence of HPV vaccination.
conclusionsWhile numbers of women attending for screening and HPV tests are anticipated to initially fluctuate as a result of the transition to a longer recommended interval, there is expected to be less fluctuation in follow-up tests and procedures; however these will still have a significant impact on operational aspects of the screening program. Detailed modelling of the switchover process gave important insights into how volumes would be affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.