Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27112138›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2016

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Florida physicians regarding dengue before and after an educational intervention.

Susanne Doblecki-Lewis, Aileen Chang, Renee Jiddou-Yaldoo, Kay M Tomashek, Danielle Stanek, Leena Anil, Paola Lichtenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susanne Doblecki-LewisDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, #850 (R-21), Miami, FL, 33155, USA. sdoblecki@med.miami.edu.
Aileen ChangDivision of General Internal Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave NW Room 5-419, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Renee Jiddou-YaldooDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Beaumont Health Grosse Pointe, 468 Cadieux Rd, Grosse Pointe, MI, 48230, USA.
Kay M TomashekDengue Branch, Division of Vector-borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA.
Danielle StanekFlorida Department of Health, Division of Disease Control and Health Protection, Zoonotic and Vectorborne Disease, 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin A12, Tallahassee, FL, 32399-1712, USA.
Leena AnilDivision of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Bureau for Public Health, West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources, 350 Capitol St. Rm. 125, Charleston, WV, 25301, USA.
Paola LichtenbergerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, #864 (R-21), Miami, FL, 33155, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFailure to recognize and appropriately manage dengue early in the clinical course may result in late initiation of supportive treatment for severe disease. In Florida, travel-related and autochthonous dengue occur and are likely under-recognized. The objective of this study was to evaluate physician knowledge of dengue and its management before and after an educational intervention in Florida.

methodsFrom 2012-13 we conducted 14 grand-rounds style lectures on dengue clinical management attended by 413 physicians, and analyzed data from the pre- and post-tests.

resultsOf those attending, 231 and 220 completed the pre-and post-tests, respectively. Overall, the mean pre-test score for knowledge-based questions was 74.3 and average post-test score was 94.2%, indicating a mean increase of 19.9% (P < 0.0001, 95% CI 17.7-22.4). Reported confidence in dengue recognition and management also increased. Non-US trained physicians and those who had treated more than ten dengue cases performed significantly better in the pre-test. Post-test scores did not differ by subgroup.

conclusionsThe train-the-trainer approach with grand-rounds style presentations appear to be an effective intervention to improve knowledge of dengue among physicians.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDengueEducation, Medical, ContinuingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTeacher TrainingTeaching RoundsControlled Before-After StudiesFloridaHumansClinical practiceDengueEvaluationPhysician trainingSurvey

Identifiers

PMID27112138
PMCPMC4845440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.