Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27111917›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Detection of BRAF Mutations Using a Fully Automated Platform and Comparison with High Resolution Melting, Real-Time Allele Specific Amplification, Immunohistochemistry and Next Generation Sequencing Assays, for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

Alexandre Harlé, Julia Salleron, Claire Franczak, Cindy Dubois, Pierre Filhine-Tressarieu, Agnès Leroux, Jean-Louis Merlin

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of Two Rapid Assays for the Detection ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Fully automated real-time PCR for EGFR testing in non-small cell lung carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. BRAF mutation testing in melanoma: results from a German observational multicenter study.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. AcceleratedOncotarget · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Detection ofOncotarget · 2017
    Article
  17. Molecular genetic and immunotherapeutic targets in metastatic melanoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre HarléUniversité de Lorraine, Faculté de Pharmacie, Nancy, France.
Julia SalleronInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Service de Biopathologie, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Claire FranczakInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Service de Biopathologie, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Cindy DuboisInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Service de Biopathologie, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Pierre Filhine-TressarieuInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Service de Biopathologie, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Agnès LerouxCNRS UMR 7039 CRAN, Nancy, France.
Jean-Louis MerlinUniversité de Lorraine, Faculté de Pharmacie, Nancy, France.
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine · FRCentre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Lorraine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic melanoma is a severe disease with one of the highest mortality rate in skin diseases. Overall survival has significantly improved with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Kinase inhibitors targeting BRAF V600 showed promising results. BRAF genotyping is mandatory for the prescription of anti-BRAF therapies.

methodsFifty-nine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded melanoma samples were assessed using High-Resolution-Melting (HRM) PCR, Real-time allele-specific amplification (RT-ASA) PCR, Next generation sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the fully-automated molecular diagnostics platform IdyllaTM. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated using NGS as the reference standard to compare the different assays.

resultsBRAF mutations were found in 28(47.5%), 29(49.2%), 31(52.5%), 29(49.2%) and 27(45.8%) samples with HRM, RT-ASA, NGS, IdyllaTM and IHC respectively. Twenty-six (81.2%) samples were found bearing a c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) mutation, three (9.4%) with a c.1798_1799delinsAA (p.Val600Lys) mutation and one with c.1789_1790delinsTC (p.Leu597Ser) mutation. Two samples were found bearing complex mutations.

conclusionsHRM appears the less sensitive assay for the detection of BRAF V600 mutations. The RT-ASA, IdyllaTM and IHC assays are suitable for routine molecular diagnostics aiming at the prescription of anti-BRAF therapies. IdyllaTM assay is fully-automated and requires less than 2 minutes for samples preparation and is the fastest of the tested assays.

Indexed as

AllelesAutomationMutationNeoplasm MetastasisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryMelanomaProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID27111917
PMCPMC4844167
OpenAlexW2343736608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.