Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27111897›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2016

Induction Immunosuppression and Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

L M Kucirka, C M Durand, S Bae, R K Avery, J E Locke, B J Orandi, M McAdams-DeMarco, M E Grams, D L Segev

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Safety of Kidney Transplantation from Donors with HIV.The New England journal of medicine · 2024
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A prospective multicenter pilot study of HIV-positive deceased donor to HIV-positive recipient kidney transplantation: HOPE in action.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  15. Early steroid withdrawal in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients: Utilization and outcomes.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Characterizing the landscape and impact of infections following kidney transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Machine learning to predict transplant outcomes: helpful or hype? A national cohort study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L M KucirkaDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
C M DurandDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
S BaeDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-0098-8816
R K AveryDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
J E LockeDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
B J OrandiDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
M McAdams-DeMarcoDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
M E GramsDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
D L SegevDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007309 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COX, ANDREA L · 1985 to 2019
$43.2M
Patient Oriented Research in Kidney Disease and Transplant SurgeryK24DK101828 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SEGEV, DORRY L. · 2014 to 2018
$922k
Understanding Mechanisms for Racial Disparities in Survival on DialysisF30DK095545 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KUCIRKA, LAUREN MARIE · 2012 to 2016
$239k
NIDDK NIH HHS F30 DK095545NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK101828NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increased risk of acute rejection (AR) in human immunodeficiency virus-positive (HIV+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Induction immunosuppression is standard of care for those at high risk of AR; however, use in HIV+ patients is controversial, given fears of increased infection rates. We sought to compare clinical outcomes between HIV+ KT recipients who were treated with (i) anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), (ii) IL-2 receptor blocker, and (iii) no induction. We studied 830 HIV+ KT recipients between 2000 and 2014, as captured in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, and compared rates of delayed graft function (DGF), AR, graft loss and death. Infections and hospitalizations were ascertained by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes in a subset of 308 patients with Medicare. Compared with no induction, neither induction agent was associated with an increased risk of infection (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-1.18). HIV+ recipients who received induction spent fewer days in the hospital (weighted relative risk [wRR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.95), had lower rates of DGF (wRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.84), less graft loss (wHR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.89) and a trend toward lower mortality (wHR 0.60, 95% CI 0.24-1.28). Those who received induction with ATG had lower rates of AR (wRR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.99). Induction in HIV+ KT recipients was not associated with increased infections; in fact, those receiving ATG, the most potent agent, had the lowest rates. In light of the high risk of AR in this population, induction therapy should be strongly considered.

Indexed as

AdultAntilymphocyte SerumFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsInduction ChemotherapyKidney Failure, ChronicKidney Function TestsKidney TransplantationAntilymphocyte SerumImmunosuppressive Agentsclinical research/practiceimmunosuppressive regimensinductioninfection and infectious agentsinfectious diseaseviral: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)

Identifiers

PMID27111897
PMCPMC4956509
OpenAlexW2343995781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.