Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27111720›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2016

CRISPR knockout screening outperforms shRNA and CRISPRi in identifying essential genes.

Bastiaan Evers, Katarzyna Jastrzebski, Jeroen P M Heijmans, Wipawadee Grernrum, Roderick L Beijersbergen, Rene Bernards

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 246 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
246citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

246 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Generation ofJBMR plus · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Dual-line Genome-scale CRISPR Screening Enables Robust Target Gene Discovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Embedded CRISPRi Enhances Gene-Silencing Efficiency in Drosophila.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

186 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bastiaan EversDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Cancer Systems Biology Centre and Cancer Genomics Centre Netherlands, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Katarzyna JastrzebskiDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Cancer Systems Biology Centre and Cancer Genomics Centre Netherlands, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jeroen P M HeijmansDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Cancer Systems Biology Centre and Cancer Genomics Centre Netherlands, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wipawadee GrernrumDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Cancer Systems Biology Centre and Cancer Genomics Centre Netherlands, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Roderick L BeijersbergenDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Cancer Systems Biology Centre and Cancer Genomics Centre Netherlands, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rene BernardsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Cancer Systems Biology Centre and Cancer Genomics Centre Netherlands, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8677-3423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput genetic screens have become essential tools for studying a wide variety of biological processes. Here we experimentally compare systems based on clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) or its transcriptionally repressive variant, CRISPR-interference (CRISPRi), with a traditional short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-based system for performing lethality screens. We find that the CRISPR technology performed best, with low noise, minimal off-target effects and consistent activity across reagents.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsGene Expression ProfilingGene Knockout TechniquesGenetic MarkersGenetic TestingRNA, Small InterferingGenetic MarkersRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID27111720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.