Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27111549›Full record

Observational studyArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2016

Nailfold Videocapillaroscopic Features and Other Clinical Risk Factors for Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study.

Maurizio Cutolo, Ariane L Herrick, Oliver Distler, Mike O Becker, Emma Beltran, Patrick Carpentier, Clodoveo Ferri, Murat Inanç, Panayiotis Vlachoyiannopoulos, Harbajan Chadha-Boreham and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Microvascular markers in systemic sclerosis: a comparative OCT-angiography and nailfold videocapillaroscopy study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Maurizio CutoloUniversity of Genoa and IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino, Genoa, Italy. mcutolo@unige.it.
Ariane L HerrickUniversity of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Oliver DistlerUniversity Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mike O BeckerUniversity Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, and Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Emma BeltranHospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Patrick CarpentierLa Tronche Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Clodoveo FerriUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Murat InançIstanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Panayiotis VlachoyiannopoulosNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Harbajan Chadha-BorehamActelion Pharmaceuticals, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Emmanuelle CottreelActelion Pharmaceuticals, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Thomas PfisterActelion Pharmaceuticals, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Daniel RosenbergActelion Pharmaceuticals, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Juan V TorresSyntax for Science, Basel, Switzerland.
Vanessa SmithGhent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. vanessa.smith@ugent.be.
CAP Study Investigators
Actelion (Switzerland) · CHAgir Pour les Maladies Chroniques · FRGhent University Hospital · BEHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESIstanbul University · TRMartin University · USNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBSpace Syntax (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify nailfold videocapillaroscopic features and other clinical risk factors for new digital ulcers (DUs) during a 6-month period in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

methodsIn this multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study, the videoCAPillaroscopy (CAP) study, we evaluated 623 patients with SSc from 59 centers (14 countries). Patients were stratified into 2 groups: a DU history group and a no DU history group. At enrollment, patients underwent detailed nailfold videocapillaroscopic evaluation and assessment of demographic characteristics, DU status, and clinical and SSc characteristics. Risk factors for developing new DUs were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analyses.

resultsOf the 468 patients in the DU history group (mean ± SD age 54.0 ± 13.7 years), 79.5% were female, 59.8% had limited cutaneous SSc, and 22% developed a new DU during follow-up. The strongest risk factors for new DUs identified by MLR in the DU history group included the mean number of capillaries per millimeter in the middle finger of the dominant hand, the number of DUs (categorized as 0, 1, 2, or ≥3), and the presence of critical digital ischemia. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of the area under the curve (AUC) of the final MLR model was 0.738 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.681-0.795). Internal validation through bootstrap generated a ROC AUC of 0.633 (95% CI 0.510-0.756).

conclusionThis international prospective study, which included detailed nailfold videocapillaroscopic evaluation and extensive clinical characterization of patients with SSc, identified the mean number of capillaries per millimeter in the middle finger of the dominant hand, the number of DUs at enrollment, and the presence of critical digital ischemia at enrollment as risk factors for the development of new DUs.

Indexed as

FingersMicroscopic AngioscopyAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Vascular DiseasesProspective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveScleroderma, LimitedScleroderma, SystemicSkin Ulcer

Identifiers

PMID27111549
PMCPMC5129545
OpenAlexW2343852330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.