Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27111283›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2016

Explant culture of sarcoma patients' tissue.

Roman Muff, Sander M Botter, Knut Husmann, Joelle Tchinda, Philomina Selvam, Franziska Seeli-Maduz, Bruno Fuchs

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03798587 (PNA-mediated Inhibition of the SENP1 Molecular Hub as a Potential Therapeutic Approach for the Suppression of Osteosarcoma Growth and Metastasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03798587 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

PNA-mediated Inhibition of the SENP1 Molecular Hub as a Potential Therapeutic Approach for the Suppression of Osteosarcoma Growth and Metastasis (PNA-OS)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorI.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'AmbrogioRan2020 to 2021Enrolled15ConditionsPrimary Osteosarcoma of Bone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roman MuffLaboratory for Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sander M BotterLaboratory for Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Knut HusmannLaboratory for Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Joelle TchindaOncology Laboratory, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philomina SelvamLaboratory for Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Franziska Seeli-MaduzLaboratory for Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bruno FuchsLaboratory for Orthopedic Research, Department of Orthopedics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity Children's Hospital Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of rare tumors that affect soft tissues and bone. Due to the scarcity and heterogeneity of these diseases, patient-derived cells that can be used for preclinical research are limited. In this study, we investigated whether the tissue explant technique can be used to obtain sarcoma cell lines from fresh as well as viable frozen tissue obtained from 8 out of 12 soft tissue and 9 out of 13 bone tumor entities as defined by the World Health Organization. The success rate, defined as the percent of samples that yielded sufficient numbers of outgrowing cells to be frozen, and the time to freeze were determined for a total of 734 sarcoma tissue specimens. In 552 cases (75%) enough cells were obtained to be frozen at early passage. Success rates were higher in bone tumors (82%) compared with soft tissue tumors (68%), and the mean time to freezing was lower in bone tumors (65 days) compared with soft tissue tumors (84 days). Overall, from 40% of the tissues cells could be frozen at early passage within <2 month after tissue removal. Comparable results as with fresh tissue were obtained after explant of viable frozen patient-derived material. In a selected number of bone and soft tissue sarcoma entities, conventional karyotyping and/or FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) analysis revealed a high amount (>60%) of abnormal cells in 41% of analyzed samples, especially in bone sarcomas (osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma). In conclusion, the explant technique is well suited to establish patient-derived cell lines for a large majority of bone and soft tissue sarcoma entities with adequate speed. This procedure thus opens the possibility for molecular analysis and drug testing for therapeutic decision making even during patient treatment.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsCell Line, TumorCryopreservationFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingMaleProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2RNA-Binding Protein EWSRNA-Binding ProteinsSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsTissue Culture TechniquesCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsEWSR1 protein, humanMDM2 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2RNA-Binding Protein EWSRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27111283
OpenAlexW2342841472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.