ArticleBone marrow transplantation2016
Association of socioeconomic status with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes for lymphoma.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of sociodemographic determinants on enrollment into contemporary lymphoma clinical trials: a systematic review.The oncologist · 2025Pooled it
- International Recommendations for Screening and Preventative Practices for Long-Term Survivors of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: A 2023 Update.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2024Guideline
- Annual household income and chronic pulmonary conditions in long-term survivors of blood or marrow transplantation: a BMTSS report.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- International recommendations for screening and preventative practices for long-term survivors of transplantation and cellular therapy: a 2023 update.Bone marrow transplantation · 2024Review
- Article
- Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors Associated with Fungal Infection Risk, United States, 2019.Emerging infectious diseases · 2022Review
- Racial disparities in time to hematopoietic cell transplant among patients with hematologic malignancies at a large urban academic center.Bone marrow transplantation · 2022Article
- Driving Distance and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020Article
- Treatment intensity and survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Denmark: a real-life population-based study.Clinical epidemiology · 2019Article
- Crossroads of Cancer and HIV-1: Pathways to a Cure for HIV.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Socioeconomic status (SES) is an important determinant of disparities in health care. The association of SES with outcomes in autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) has not been described previously. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 687 AHCT recipients with lymphoma transplanted between 2003 and 2013. Patients were categorized into low (<$50 000/year) and high SES (⩾$50 000/year). A greater proportion of low SES patients lived farther away from our center (median 54 vs 28 miles), belonged to a racial minority (12 vs 3%), had poorer performance status (4 vs 1%) and had high-risk disease at AHCT (9 vs 5%). Median follow-up was 53 months. In univariable analysis, low SES patients had significantly higher relapse mortality and lower OS and PFS. This was confirmed on multivariable analysis for relapse mortality (HR for high vs low SES: 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54-0.99), P=0.05), OS (HR 0.74 (0.58-0.95), P=0.02) and PFS (HR 0.77 (0.63-0.95), P=0.02). In multivariable analysis of ⩾1-year progression-free survivors, high SES patients had better OS (HR 0.73, P=0.05 vs low SES) that was primarily driven by a trend toward lower risk of non-relapse mortality (HR 0.62, P=0.06). SES is associated with outcomes of AHCT in patients with lymphoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27111046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.