Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27110814›Full record

ArticleViruses2016

HIV-1 Mutation and Recombination Rates Are Different in Macrophages and T-cells.

Deborah Cromer, Timothy E Schlub, Redmond P Smyth, Andrew J Grimm, Abha Chopra, Simon Mallal, Miles P Davenport, Johnson Mak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Biology and Diversification of Human Retroviruses.Frontiers in virology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Deborah CromerInfection Analytics Program, Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. d.cromer@unsw.edu.au.
Timothy E SchlubSydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. tim.schlub@sydney.edu.au.
Redmond P SmythCentre for Virology, Burnet Institute, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia. r.smyth@ibmc-cnrs.unistra.fr.
Andrew J GrimmInfection Analytics Program, Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. andrew.j.grimm@gmail.com.
Abha ChopraInstitute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases (IIID), Murdoch University, Perth WA 6150, Australia. a.chopra@iiid.com.au.
Simon MallalInstitute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases (IIID), Murdoch University, Perth WA 6150, Australia. S.Mallal@iiid.com.au.
Miles P DavenportInfection Analytics Program, Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. mdavenport@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Johnson MakBiosecurity Flagship, CSIRO (AAHL), Geelong VIC 3220, Australia. johnson.mak@deakin.edu.au.
Murdoch University · AUUNSW Sydney · AUCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High rates of mutation and recombination help human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to evade the immune system and develop resistance to antiretroviral therapy. Macrophages and T-cells are the natural target cells of HIV-1 infection. A consensus has not been reached as to whether HIV replication results in differential recombination between primary T-cells and macrophages. Here, we used HIV with silent mutation markers along with next generation sequencing to compare the mutation and the recombination rates of HIV directly in T lymphocytes and macrophages. We observed a more than four-fold higher recombination rate of HIV in macrophages compared to T-cells (p < 0.001) and demonstrated that this difference is not due to different reliance on C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) and C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) co-receptors between T-cells and macrophages. We also found that the pattern of recombination across the HIV genome (hot and cold spots) remains constant between T-cells and macrophages despite a three-fold increase in the overall recombination rate. This indicates that the difference in rates is a general feature of HIV DNA synthesis during macrophage infection. In contrast to HIV recombination, we found that T-cells have a 30% higher mutation rate than macrophages (p < 0.001) and that the mutational profile is similar between these cell types. Unexpectedly, we found no association between mutation and recombination in macrophages, in contrast to T-cells. Our data highlights some of the fundamental difference of HIV recombination and mutation amongst these two major target cells of infection. Understanding these differences will provide invaluable insights toward HIV evolution and how the virus evades immune surveillance and anti-retroviral therapeutics.

Indexed as

MutationRecombination, GeneticAlgorithmsCell LineCells, CulturedEvolution, MolecularHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMacrophagesModels, TheoreticalMutation RateReceptors, CCR5Receptors, CXCR4T-LymphocytesVirus ReplicationReceptors, CCR5Receptors, CXCR4evolutionHIVmutationrecombination

Identifiers

PMID27110814
PMCPMC4848610
OpenAlexW2337041276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.