Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27110750›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Delivery of Gemcitabine Prodrugs Employing Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles.

Alessio Malfanti, Ivana Miletto, Emanuela Bottinelli, Daniele Zonari, Giulia Blandino, Gloria Berlier, Silvia Arpicco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Differential response to doxorubicin in breast cancer subtypes simulated by a microfluidic tumor model.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessio MalfantiDipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Università di Torino, Via P. Giuria 9, 10125 Torino, Italy. alessio.malfanti89@gmail.com.
Ivana MilettoDipartimento di Chimica and NIS (Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces) Centre, Università di Torino, Via P. Giuria 7, 10125 Torino, Italy. ivana.miletto@uniupo.it.
Emanuela BottinelliDipartimento di Chimica and NIS (Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces) Centre, Università di Torino, Via P. Giuria 7, 10125 Torino, Italy. embottinelli@hotmail.com.
Daniele ZonariDipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Università di Torino, Via P. Giuria 9, 10125 Torino, Italy. daniele.zonari@unito.it.
Giulia BlandinoDipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Università di Torino, Via P. Giuria 9, 10125 Torino, Italy. giulia.blandino.gb@gmail.com.
Gloria BerlierDipartimento di Chimica and NIS (Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces) Centre, Università di Torino, Via P. Giuria 7, 10125 Torino, Italy. gloria.berlier@unito.it.
Silvia ArpiccoDipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Università di Torino, Via P. Giuria 9, 10125 Torino, Italy. silvia.arpicco@unito.it.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) were studied as vehicles for the delivery of the antitumoral drug gemcitabine (GEM) and of its 4-(N)-acyl derivatives, (4-(N)-valeroyl-(C5GEM), 4-(N)-lauroyl-(C12GEM) and 4-(N)-stearoyl-gemcitabine (C18GEM)). The loading of the GEM lipophilic prodrugs on MSNs was explored with the aim to obtain both a physical and a chemical protection of GEM from rapid plasmatic metabolization. For this purpose, MSNs as such or with grafted aminopropyl and carboxyethyl groups were prepared and characterized. Then, their different drug loading capacity in relation to the nature of the functional group was evaluated. In our experimental conditions, GEM was not loaded in any MSNs, while C12GEM was the most efficiently encapsulated and employed for further evaluation. The results showed that loading capacity increased with the presence of functional groups on the nanoparticles; similarly, the presence of functional groups on MSNs' surface influenced the drug release profile. Finally, the cytotoxicity of the different preparations was evaluated and data showed that C12GEM loaded MSNs are less cytotoxic than the free drug with an activity that increased with the incubating time, indicating that all these systems are able to release the drug in a controlled manner. Altogether, the results demonstrate that these MSNs could be an interesting system for the delivery of anticancer drugs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDeoxycytidineDrug Delivery SystemsGemcitabineHumansNanoparticlesParticle SizePorosityProdrugsSilicon DioxideAntineoplastic AgentsDeoxycytidineGemcitabineProdrugsSilicon Dioxideanticancer drugsbiomaterialsdrug delivery systemsmesoporous silica nanoparticlesprodrugssurface chemistry

Identifiers

PMID27110750
PMCPMC6273405
OpenAlexW2341704744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.