Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27110494›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2016

Process evaluation of a technology-delivered screening and brief intervention for substance use in primary care.

Steven J Ondersma, Jan Gryczynski, Shannon Gwin Mitchell, Kevin E O'Grady, Robert P Schwartz

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steven J OndersmaMerrill-Palmer Skillman Institute and Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University, 71 E. Ferry Ave., Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Jan GryczynskiFriends Research Institute, Inc., 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Shannon Gwin MitchellFriends Research Institute, Inc., 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Kevin E O'GradyUniversity of Maryland, College Park, Department of Psychology, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Robert P SchwartzFriends Research Institute, Inc., 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Friends Research Institute · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USWayne State University · US

Funding

SBIRT in New MexicoR01DA026003 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SCHWARTZ, ROBERT P · 2009 to 2013
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychotherapy process research examines the content of treatment sessions and their association with outcomes in an attempt to better understand the interactions between therapists and clients, and to elucidate mechanisms of behavior change. A similar approach is possible in technology-delivered interventions, which have an interaction process that is always perfectly preserved and rigorously definable. The present study sought to examine the process of participants' interactions with a computer-delivered brief intervention for drug use, from a study comparing computer- and therapist-delivered brief interventions among adults at two primary health care centers in New Mexico. Specifically, we sought to describe the pattern of participants' (

Indexed as

adultsbrief interventione-Healthprocess researchsubstance abuse

Identifiers

PMID27110494
PMCPMC4836054
OpenAlexW2260146716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.