ArticleEuPA open proteomics2014
Characterisation of potential novel allergens in the fish parasite
Article in EuPA open proteomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods for the detection of anisakid material in different food matrices: A systematic review.Food and waterborne parasitology · 2026Review
- Deciphering Allergen Peptides for Dermatological and Cosmetic Applications with Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Anisakiasis: A Decade of Molecular and Diagnostic Advancements (2015-2026).International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Foodborne Helminths in Imported Fish: Molecular Evidence from Fish Products in the Kazakhstan Market.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics for Seafood Allergen Detection and Quantification: Current Trends and Technological Frontiers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- An Assessment of the Currently Available Molecular Assay for the Diagnosis of Anisakis Sensitization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Protective immune response in rainbow trout (Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Re-evaluation of certain aspects of the EFSA Scientific Opinion of April 2010 on risk assessment of parasites in fishery products, based on new scientific data. Part 1: ToRs1-3.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Basophil Activation Test in the Diagnosis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Identification of broadly-conserved parasitic nematode proteins that activate immunity.Frontiers in parasitology · 2023Article
- Tandem Mass Tagging (TMT) Reveals Tissue-Specific Proteome of L4 Larvae ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Proteomic Profiling and In Silico Characterization of the Secretome ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Proteomic Insights into the Biology of the Most Important Foodborne Parasites in Europe.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Mammalian Atg8 proteins and the autophagy factor IRGM control mTOR and TFEB at a regulatory node critical for responses to pathogens.Nature cell biology · 2020Article
- Proteomic and Bioinformatic Investigations of Heat-TreatedBiomolecules · 2020Article
- Review
- Risk-based scoring and genetic identification for anisakids in frozen fish products from Atlantic FAO areas.BMC veterinary research · 2020Article
- Potential Transfer of Peanut and/or Soy Proteins from Poultry Feed to the Meat and/or Eggs Produced.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Anisakis Sensitization in the Croatian fish processing workers: Behavioral instead of occupational risk factors?PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The parasitic nematode
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.