Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27110269›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2016

Skeletal regeneration in the brittle star Amphiura filiformis.

Anna Czarkwiani, Cinzia Ferrario, David Viktor Dylus, Michela Sugni, Paola Oliveri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Studying Echinodermata Arm Explant Regeneration Using Echinaster sepositus.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Regeneration in Echinoderms: Molecular Advancements.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna CzarkwianiDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.
Cinzia FerrarioDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
David Viktor DylusDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK ; Centre for Mathematics, Physics and Engineering in the Life Sciences and Experimental Biology, University College London, London, UK ; Present address: Department of Ecology and Evolution & Center for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michela SugniDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Paola OliveriDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK ; Research Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Room 426, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK.
University College London · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrittle stars regenerate their whole arms post-amputation. Amphiura filiformis can now be used for molecular characterization of arm regeneration due to the availability of transcriptomic data. Previous work showed that specific developmental transcription factors known to take part in echinoderm skeletogenesis are expressed during adult arm regeneration in A. filiformis; however, the process of skeleton formation remained poorly understood. Here, we present the results of an in-depth microscopic analysis of skeletal morphogenesis during regeneration, using calcein staining, EdU labeling and in situ hybridization.

resultsTo better compare different samples, we propose a staging system for the early A. filiformis arm regeneration stages based on morphological landmarks identifiable in living animals and supported by histological analysis. We show that the calcified spicules forming the endoskeleton first appear very early during regeneration in the dermal layer of regenerates. These spicules then mature into complex skeletal elements of the differentiated arm during late regeneration. The mesenchymal cells in the dermal area express the skeletal marker genes Afi-c-lectin, Afi-p58b and Afi-p19; however, EdU labeling shows that these dermal cells do not proliferate.

conclusionsA. filiformis arms regenerate through a consistent set of developmental stages using a distalization-intercalation mode, despite variability in regeneration rate. Skeletal elements form in a mesenchymal cell layer that does not proliferate and thus must be supplied from a different source. Our work provides the basis for future cellular and molecular studies of skeleton regeneration in brittle stars.

Indexed as

Brittle starC-lectinEchinodermsp19p58bProliferationRegenerationSkeleton

Identifiers

PMID27110269
PMCPMC4841056
OpenAlexW2338416027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.