Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27110268›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2016

Current Status of Standardization of Traditional Chinese Medicine in China.

Juan Wang, Yi Guo, Gui Lan Li

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A comprehensive review ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Use of Multiple Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Chinese Herbal Medicine.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan WangBaokang Hospital, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 88, Yuquan Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300193, China; Plot Construction Unit of Acupuncture and Moxibustion and Standardization Research Center of State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7595-4939
Yi GuoPlot Construction Unit of Acupuncture and Moxibustion and Standardization Research Center of State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China; Acupuncture and Moxibustion College, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 312, Anshan West Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300193, China.
Gui Lan LiBaokang Hospital, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 88, Yuquan Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300193, China; Plot Construction Unit of Acupuncture and Moxibustion and Standardization Research Center of State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China.
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an important component of traditional medicine, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is widely spread and applied in more than 100 countries across the world. The standardization of TCM is very important for the international application of Chinese medicine. In this paper, we have explained and analyzed the standardization situations of TCM in China with the purpose of providing reference for standardization and international development of TCM.

Identifiers

PMID27110268
PMCPMC4826698
OpenAlexW2309018031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.