Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27110215›Full record

ArticleSri Lankan journal of applied statistics

The Use of Multiple Imputation for Data Subject to Limits of Detection.

Ofer Harel, Neil Perkins, Enrique F Schisterman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sri Lankan journal of applied statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Impacts of dietary exposure to pesticides on faecal microbiome metabolism in adult twins.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ofer HarelDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, USA.
Neil PerkinsEpidemiology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child and Human Development, Rockvile, MD, USA.
Enrique F SchistermanEpidemiology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child and Human Development, Rockvile, MD, USA.

Funding

ROC Curve MethodologyZIAHD008761 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SCHISTERMAN, ENRIQUE F. · 2009 to 2021
$2.1M
Dealing with missing data in HIV prevention trialsK01MH087219 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI HAREL, OFER · 2010 to 2014
$889k
ROC Curve MethodologyZ01HD008761 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI SCHISTERMAN, ENRIQUE · 2003 to 2008
$180k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HD008761NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH087219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Missing data due to limit of detection and limit of quantification is a common obstacle in epidemiological and biomedical research. We are interested in methodologies that provide unbiased and efficient estimates of these missing data while using popular statistical software. We describe a multiple imputation (MI) procedure for cross-sectional and longitudinal data which examines the sources of variation of hormones levels throughout the menstrual cycle conditional on specific biomarkers. We describe the rational, procedure, advantages and disadvantages of the multiple imputation procedure. We also provide a comparison to commonly used missing data procedures (complete cases analysis and single imputation). We illustrate our approach using the BioCycle data where we are interested in the effects of Vitamin E and Beta-carotene on Progesterone levels. We also evaluate the longitudinal impact of changes in Vitamin E on Progesterone levels over time. Finaly, we demonstrate the advantages of using MI over complete case analysis or naive single replacement in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis where measurements below the limit of quantification (LOQ) are unreported. We also illustrate that if available, inclusion of potentially demined unreliable data below the limit of detection (LOD) improves simple estimation substantially.

Indexed as

Complete case analysisCross sectional dataLongitudinal analysisMultiple imputation procedure

Identifiers

PMID27110215
PMCPMC4838401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.