Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27110120›Full record

ReviewTherapeutics and clinical risk management2016

Treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria: a review of the newest antihistamine drug bilastine.

Xue Yan Wang, Margaret Lim-Jurado, Narayanan Prepageran, Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn, De Yun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Aeroallergens in Atopic Dermatitis and Chronic Urticaria.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Differential Regulation of Bilastine Affinity for Human Histamine HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Balanced discussion of second-generation antihistamines' data.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Xue Yan WangDepartment of Allergy, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Margaret Lim-JuradoSt Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Manila, Philippines.
Narayanan PrepageranDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Malaya Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Pongsakorn TantilipikornRhinology and Allergy Division, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
De Yun WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Beijing Shijitan Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNSiriraj Hospital · THSt. Luke's Medical Center · PHUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allergic rhinitis and urticaria are common allergic diseases that may have a major negative impact on patients' quality of life. Bilastine, a novel new-generation antihistamine that is highly selective for the H1 histamine receptor, has a rapid onset and prolonged duration of action. This agent does not interact with the cytochrome P450 system and does not undergo significant metabolism in humans, suggesting that it has very low potential for drug-drug interactions, and does not require dose adjustment in renal impairment. As bilastine is not metabolized and is excreted largely unchanged, hepatic impairment is not expected to increase systemic exposure above the drug's safety margin. Bilastine has demonstrated similar efficacy to cetirizine and desloratadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and, in a Vienna Chamber study, a potentially longer duration of action than fexofenadine in patients with asymptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis. It has also shown significant efficacy (similar to that of cetirizine) and safety in the long-term treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. Bilastine showed similar efficacy to levocetirizine in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and can be safely used at doses of up to fourfold higher than standard dosage (80 mg once daily). The fourfold higher than standard dose is specified as an acceptable second-line treatment option for urticaria in international guidelines. Bilastine is generally well tolerated, both at standard and at supratherapeutic doses, appears to have less sedative potential than other second-generation antihistamines, and has no cardiotoxicity. Based on its pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, and tolerability profile, bilastine will be valuable in the management of allergic rhinitis and urticaria.

Indexed as

allergic rhinitisbilastinesecond-generation antihistaminesurticaria

Identifiers

PMID27110120
PMCPMC4835134
OpenAlexW2336895030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.