Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27110082›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of human-computer interaction

Designing an Educational Website to Improve Quality of Supportive Oncology Care for Women with Ovarian Cancer: An Expert Usability Review and Analysis.

Molly A McClellan, Raghav Pavan Karumur, Rachel Isaksson Vogel, Sue V Petzel, Julie Cragg, Daniel Chan, Julie A Jacko, François Sainfort, Melissa A Geller

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of human-computer interaction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Molly A McClellanDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Raghav Pavan KarumurDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Rachel Isaksson VogelMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sue V PetzelDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Julie CraggInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Daniel ChanDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Julie A JackoDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
François SainfortDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Melissa A GellerDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A broad-based research team developed a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant educational website for women with ovarian cancer to improve the quality of supportive oncology care. Prior to a randomized clinical trial of the website, initial usability testing was implemented to evaluate the website. The initial review found that 165/247 checklist items had sufficient information to allow for evaluation with the website achieving an overall score of 63%. By category, lowest scores were for the Home Page, Task Orientation, Page Layout & Visual Design, and Help, Feedback & Error Tolerance. Major issues thought to potentially impede actual usage were prioritized in redevelopment and the second usability review, conducted by the same expert, saw an improvement in scores. Incorporating usability concepts from the start of development, fulfilling the positive expectations of end-users and identifying technical and personal factors that optimize use may greatly enhance usage of health websites.

Indexed as

eHealthHeuristic evaluationOvarian CancerUsabilityWebsite

Identifiers

PMID27110082
PMCPMC4838192
OpenAlexW2291837384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.