Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27109826›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Comparative analysis of ear-hole closure identifies epimorphic regeneration as a discrete trait in mammals.

Thomas R Gawriluk, Jennifer Simkin, Katherine L Thompson, Shishir K Biswas, Zak Clare-Salzler, John M Kimani, Stephen G Kiama, Jeramiah J Smith, Vanessa O Ezenwa, Ashley W Seifert

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Extracellular matrix remodeling supportsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Specific cell states underlie complex tissue regeneration in spiny mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Complex tissue regeneration inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Osteogenic shift in the adipose-derived stem cells ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas R GawrilukDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9868-9704
Jennifer SimkinDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.
Katherine L ThompsonDepartment of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.
Shishir K BiswasDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.
Zak Clare-SalzlerDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.
John M KimaniDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology, University of Nairobi, PO Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Stephen G KiamaDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology, University of Nairobi, PO Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jeramiah J SmithDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5333-5531
Vanessa O EzenwaOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
Ashley W SeifertDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.
University of Kentucky · USUniversity of Nairobi · KEUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why mammals have poor regenerative ability has remained a long-standing question in biology. In regenerating vertebrates, injury can induce a process known as epimorphic regeneration to replace damaged structures. Using a 4-mm ear punch assay across multiple mammalian species, here we show that several Acomys spp. (spiny mice) and Oryctolagus cuniculus completely regenerate tissue, whereas other rodents including MRL/MpJ 'healer' mice heal similar injuries by scarring. We demonstrate ear-hole closure is independent of ear size, and closure rate can be modelled with a cubic function. Cellular and genetic analyses reveal that injury induces blastema formation in Acomys cahirinus. Despite cell cycle re-entry in Mus musculus and A. cahirinus, efficient cell cycle progression and proliferation only occurs in spiny mice. Together, our data unite blastema-mediated regeneration in spiny mice with regeneration in other vertebrates such as salamanders, newts and zebrafish, where all healthy adults regenerate in response to injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell ProliferationEar, ExternalFemaleGene Expression ProfilingMaleMammalsMiceMurinaeRabbitsRegenerationSpecies SpecificityWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID27109826
PMCPMC4848467
OpenAlexW2345160986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.