ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2016
Development of Novel Small Hairpin RNAs That do not Require Processing by Dicer or AGO2.
Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Co-Delivery of Natural Products and Small RNAs for Cancer Therapy: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advanced gene therapy system for the treatment of solid tumour: A review.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- LncRNAs and miRs as epigenetic signatures in diabetic cardiac fibrosis: new advances and perspectives.Endocrine · 2018Review
- Comprehensive Evolutionary Analysis of the Major RNA-Induced Silencing Complex Members.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Dicer-independent processing of small RNA duplexes: mechanistic insights and applications.Nucleic acids research · 2017Review
- MicroRNA-34a: A Versatile Regulator of Myriads of Targets in Different Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Nano-based delivery of RNAi in cancer therapy.Molecular cancer · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The innate cytokine response to nucleic acid is the most challenging problem confronting the practical use of nucleic acid medicine. The degree of stimulation of the innate cytokine response strongly depends on the length of the nucleic acid. In this study, we developed a 30-nucleotide single-strand RNA, termed "guide hairpin RNA (ghRNA, ghR)", that has a physiological function similar to that of miRNA and siRNA. The ghR caused no innate cytokine response either in vitro or in vivo. In addition, its structure does not contain a passenger strand seed sequence, reducing the unwanted gene repression relative to existing short RNA reagents. Systemic and local injection of ghR-form miR-34a (ghR-34a) suppressed tumor growth in a mouse model of RAS-induced lung cancer. Furthermore, Dicer and AGO2 are not required for ghR-34a function. This novel RNA interference (RNAi) technology may provide a novel, safe, and effective nucleic acid drug platform that will increase the clinical usefulness of nucleic acid therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.