Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27109385›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Biofluorescence in Catsharks (Scyliorhinidae): Fundamental Description and Relevance for Elasmobranch Visual Ecology.

David F Gruber, Ellis R Loew, Dimitri D Deheyn, Derya Akkaynak, Jean P Gaffney, W Leo Smith, Matthew P Davis, Jennifer H Stern, Vincent A Pieribone, John S Sparks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bright green fluorescence of Asian paper wasp nests.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David F GruberBaruch College, City University of New York, Department of Natural Sciences, New York, NY 10010, USA.
Ellis R LoewCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Dimitri D DeheynUniversity of California, San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Derya AkkaynakUniversity of Haifa, Charney School of Marine Sciences, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.
Jean P GaffneyBaruch College, City University of New York, Department of Natural Sciences, New York, NY 10010, USA.
W Leo SmithUniversity of Kansas, Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Lawrence, KS 66049, USA.
Matthew P DavisSt. Cloud State University, Department of Biological Sciences, St. Cloud, MN 56301, USA.
Jennifer H SternUniversity of Kansas, Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Lawrence, KS 66049, USA.
Vincent A PieriboneThe John B. Pierce Laboratory, Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
John S SparksAmerican Museum of Natural History, Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, New York, NY 10024, USA.

Funding

Genetically-Encoded Voltage Probe DevelopmentR01NS083875 · NINDS · JOHN B. PIERCE LABORATORY, INC. · PI HUGHES, THOMAS E, NITABACH, MICHAEL · 2013 to 2016
$2.3M
Development of Protein-based Voltage ProbesU01NS090565 · NINDS · JOHN B. PIERCE LABORATORY, INC. · PI PIERIBONE, VINCENT A · 2014 to 2016
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083875NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofluorescence has recently been found to be widespread in marine fishes, including sharks. Catsharks, such as the Swell Shark (Cephaloscyllium ventriosum) from the eastern Pacific and the Chain Catshark (Scyliorhinus retifer) from the western Atlantic, are known to exhibit bright green fluorescence. We examined the spectral sensitivity and visual characteristics of these reclusive sharks, while also considering the fluorescent properties of their skin. Spectral absorbance of the photoreceptor cells in these sharks revealed the presence of a single visual pigment in each species. Cephaloscyllium ventriosum exhibited a maximum absorbance of 484 ± 3 nm and an absorbance range at half maximum (λ1/2max) of 440-540 nm, whereas for S. retifer maximum absorbance was 488 ± 3 nm with the same absorbance range. Using the photoreceptor properties derived here, a "shark eye" camera was designed and developed that yielded contrast information on areas where fluorescence is anatomically distributed on the shark, as seen from other sharks' eyes of these two species. Phylogenetic investigations indicate that biofluorescence has evolved at least three times in cartilaginous fishes. The repeated evolution of biofluorescence in elasmobranchs, coupled with a visual adaptation to detect it; and evidence that biofluorescence creates greater luminosity contrast with the surrounding background, highlights the potential importance of biofluorescence in elasmobranch behavior and biology.

Indexed as

FluorescenceAdaptation, OcularAnimalsBehaviorBiological EvolutionElasmobranchiiPhotoreceptor CellsPhylogenyPigments, BiologicalSharksSkin Physiological PhenomenaVision, OcularPigments, Biological

Identifiers

PMID27109385
PMCPMC4843165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.