Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27108236›Full record

ReviewParticle and fibre toxicology2016

Aerosol generation and characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes exposed to cells cultured at the air-liquid interface.

William W Polk, Monita Sharma, Christie M Sayes, Jon A Hotchkiss, Amy J Clippinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. New approach methodologies (NAMs) for theFrontiers in toxicology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pathway-based predictive approaches for non-animal assessment of acute inhalation toxicity.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2018
    Review
  14. Through the Looking Glass:Applied in vitro toxicology · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William W PolkIntegrated Laboratory Systems, Inc, Contractor Supporting the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Monita SharmaPETA International Science Consortium Ltd, London, UK.
Christie M SayesDepartment of Environmental Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
Jon A HotchkissThe Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI, USA.
Amy J ClippingerPETA International Science Consortium Ltd, London, UK. AmyJC@piscltd.org.uk.

Funding

NIEHS NIH HHS HHSN273201500010CPHS HHS HHSN27320140003CPHS HHS HHSN273201500010C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aerosol generation and characterization are critical components in the assessment of the inhalation hazards of engineered nanomaterials (NMs). An extensive review was conducted on aerosol generation and exposure apparatus as part of an international expert workshop convened to discuss the design of an in vitro testing strategy to assess pulmonary toxicity following exposure to aerosolized particles. More specifically, this workshop focused on the design of an in vitro method to predict the development of pulmonary fibrosis in humans following exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Aerosol generators, for dry or liquid particle suspension aerosolization, and exposure chambers, including both commercially available systems and those developed by independent researchers, were evaluated. Additionally, characterization methods that can be used and the time points at which characterization can be conducted in order to interpret in vitro exposure results were assessed. Summarized below is the information presented and discussed regarding the relevance of various aerosol generation and characterization techniques specific to aerosolized MWCNTs exposed to cells cultured at the air-liquid interface (ALI). The generation of MWCNT aerosols relevant to human exposures and their characterization throughout exposure in an ALI system is critical for extrapolation of in vitro results to toxicological outcomes in humans.

Indexed as

Acute Lung InjuryAerosolsAnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesBlood-Air BarrierCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedCongresses as TopicEpithelial CellsHumansInhalation ExposureNanotubes, CarbonParticle SizeRisk AssessmentToxicity TestsAerosolsNanotubes, CarbonAerosol engineeringAir-liquid interfaceALICell culture modelCharacterizationExposureMWCNTs

Identifiers

PMID27108236
PMCPMC4842292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.