ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2016
Risk calculators-methods, development, implementation, and validation.
Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of the VTE-PREDICT calculator on clinicians' decision making in fictional patients with venous thromboembolism: a randomized controlled trial.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- A predictive nomogram-based model for lower extremity compartment syndrome after trauma in the United States: a retrospective case-control study.Journal of trauma and injury · 2024Article
- Article
- Development of a Predictive Nomogram for Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery.The Journal of surgical research · 2024Article
- Evaluation of ACS-NSQIP and CR-POSSUM risk calculators for the prediction of mortality after colorectal surgery: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Patients with Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Liver Resection.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Article
- Nomogram to predict postoperative complications in elderly with total hip replacement.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Predicting the earliest deviation in weight gain in the course towards manifest overweight in offspring exposed to obesity in pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study.BMC medicine · 2022Article
- The Hidden Pandemic: the Cost of Postoperative Complications.Current anesthesiology reports · 2022Review
- A non-linear ensemble model-based surgical risk calculator for mixed data from multiple surgical fields.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- A postdischarge venous thromboembolism risk calculator for inflammatory bowel disease surgery.Surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- Post-discharge venous thromboembolism after pancreatectomy for malignancy: Predicting risk based on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors.Journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Analysis and Review of Automated Risk Calculators Used to Predict Postoperative Complications After Orthopedic Surgery.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2020Review
- Predicting Patient-Centered Outcomes from Spine Surgery Using Risk Assessment Tools: a Systematic Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2020Review
- Perioperative Transfusions and Venous Thromboembolism.Pediatrics · 2020Article
- Pre-Operative, Intra-Operative, and Post-Operative Factors Associated with Post-Discharge Venous Thromboembolism Following Colorectal Cancer Resection.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020Article
- Association of Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusions With Venous Thromboembolism in a North American Registry.JAMA surgery · 2018Article
- Predicting morbidity of liver resection.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2018Article
- Myocardial Infarction After Vascular Surgery-Reply.JAMA surgery · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA surgical risk calculator (SRC) estimates the probabilities of unfavorable outcomes such as complications or death after a specific surgery. The risk estimates are based on information regarding the patient's medical history and his current status. They are calculated using risk models derived from the analysis of data from a large number of previous patients in a similar clinical situation.
methodsThis paper discusses several aspects of the SRC development and its implementation into clinical practice: the development of the statistical risk models, their validation and software implementation, the use of the SRC output for shared decision making in clinical settings, and the evaluation of the SRC's impact on individual patient outcomes as well as on the institution's quality of care of the clinical institution.
resultsProbably the most elaborate SRC is the ACS NSQIP SRC. A comparable project was started by the German Society for Visceral and General Surgery (DGAV) in the framework of its Study, Documentation, and Quality Center (StuDoQ). It is relevant to consider that the transportability of a SRC from a US American to a German setting is not straightforward.
conclusionsRisk calculators are important instruments for shared decision making between patients and doctor. Their implementation into clinical practice has to solve technical issues, and it is related to appropriate training of clinicians. There are specific study designs to evaluate the clinical impact of a SCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27108006What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.