Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27108005›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2016

The Role of Direct Current Electric Field-Guided Stem Cell Migration in Neural Regeneration.

Li Yao, Yongchao Li

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biophysical control of plasticity and patterning in regeneration and cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Mathematical models of neuronal growth.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2022
    Review
  11. EngineeringAPL bioengineering · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Crosstalk between Bone and Nerves within Bone.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li YaoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, 67260, USA. li.yao@wichita.edu.
Yongchao LiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, 67260, USA.
Wichita State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective directional axonal growth and neural cell migration are crucial in the neural regeneration of the central nervous system (CNS). Endogenous currents have been detected in many developing nervous systems. Experiments have demonstrated that applied direct current (DC) electric fields (EFs) can guide axonal growth in vitro, and attempts have been made to enhance the regrowth of damaged spinal cord axons using DC EFs in in vivo experiments. Recent work has revealed that the migration of stem cells and stem cell-derived neural cells can be guided by DC EFs. These studies have raised the possibility that endogenous and applied DC EFs can be used to direct neural tissue regeneration. Although the mechanism of EF-directed axonal growth and cell migration has not been fully understood, studies have shown that the polarization of cell membrane proteins and the activation of intracellular signaling molecules are involved in the process. The application of EFs is a promising biotechnology for regeneration of the CNS.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MovementCentral Nervous SystemElectricityHumansNerve RegenerationNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisSignal TransductionElectric fieldsGuidanceMigrationNeural regenerationStem cells

Identifiers

PMID27108005
OpenAlexW2341060906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.