Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27107928›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2016

GI stem cells - new insights into roles in physiology and pathophysiology.

Susan J Henning, Richard J von Furstenberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. HOPXAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2021
    Article
  4. P16Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dclk1-expressing tuft cells: critical modulators of the intestinal niche?American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan J HenningDepartment of Medicine - Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7555, USA.
Richard J von FurstenbergDepartment of Medicine - Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Duke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Temitope O. Keku · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Coordinating CenterU01DK085532 · NIDDK · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2009 to 2018
$6.5M
Limited Competition for the Continuation of the Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium Coordinating CenterU24DK085532 · NIDDK · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI NILAND, JOYCE CAROL · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK085532NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK085532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This overview gives a brief historical summary of key discoveries regarding stem cells of the small intestine. The current concept is that there are two pools of intestinal stem cells (ISCs): an actively cycling pool that is marked by Lgr5, is relatively homogeneous and is responsible for daily turnover of the epithelium; and a slowly cycling or quiescent pool that functions as reserve ISCs. The latter pool appears to be quite heterogeneous and may include partially differentiated epithelial lineages that can reacquire stem cell characteristics following injury to the intestine. Markers and methods of isolation for active and quiescent ISC populations are described as well as the numerous important advances that have been made in approaches to the in vitro culture of ISCs and crypts. Factors regulating ISC biology are briefly summarized and both known and unknown aspects of the ISC niche are discussed. Although most of our current knowledge regarding ISC physiology and pathophysiology has come from studies with mice, recent work with human tissue highlights the potential translational applications arising from this field of research. Many of these topics are further elaborated in the following articles.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestinesStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID27107928
PMCPMC4847377
OpenAlexW2344022474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.