Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27107756›Full record

SynthesisClinical rheumatology2016

Withdrawal of biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tais Freire Galvao, Ivan Ricardo Zimmermann, Licia Maria Henrique da Mota, Marcus Tolentino Silva, Mauricio Gomes Pereira

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tais Freire GalvaoGetulio Vargas University Hospital, Federal University of Amazonas, Av Apurina 4 Praca 14 CEP, 69020-170, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. taisgalvao@gmail.com.
Ivan Ricardo ZimmermannFaculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
Licia Maria Henrique da MotaBrasilia University Hospital, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
Marcus Tolentino SilvaFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Mauricio Gomes PereiraFaculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of withdrawing biologics from patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission or low disease activity. This is a systematic review of clinical trials that randomized withdrawal or continuation of biologics. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and other databases. Three authors independently selected and extracted the data from the studies. The GRADE approach was employed to assess the quality of the evidence. We calculated meta-analyses of random effects model and estimated the heterogeneity by I (2). The number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated for significant outcomes. We included six trials (N = 1927 patients), most were industry-sponsored. Compared to withdrawing, continuing biologics increased the probability of low disease activity (relative risk [RR] = 0.66, 95 % CI 0.51-0.84, I (2) = 91 %, NNT = 4, low quality), remission (0.57, 0.44-0.74, I (2) = 82 %, NNT = 3, low quality), and radiographic progression (RR = 0.91, 95 % CI 0.85-0.98, I (2) = 13 %, NNT = 12, moderate quality). No significant difference was detected in the incidence of serious adverse events, serious infection, malignancy, and scores of improvement of tender and swollen joints between these strategies (low quality). A worse profile of outcomes was experienced by those patients when compared to the ones that continued biologics, but almost half of patients maintained low disease activity after withdrawal. As the quality of evidence was low, the conclusions may change as new results become available. The potential harms and benefits of this decision must be discussed with patients.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsHumansInfliximabMethotrexateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsInfliximabMethotrexateAntirheumatic agentsRemissionRheumatoid arthritisWithdrawalWithholding treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.