ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016
Quality indicators for pharmaceutical care: a comprehensive set with national scores for Dutch community pharmacies.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Developing a quality framework for community pharmacy: a systematic review of international literature.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe definition of quality indicators for pharmaceutical care: a systematic literature review and international consensus development.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of a clinical medication review in vulnerable older patients at hospital discharge, a randomized controlled trial.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Patient-reported common symptoms as an assessment of interventions in medication reviews: a randomised, controlled trial.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Trial
- Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of medication safety recommendations: focus groups with stakeholders.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Validation of quality indicators for evaluating geriatric pharmacotherapy services in primary care: a mixed methods study.BMJ open · 2023Observational
- Job Satisfaction and Burnout Levels of the Human Resources of a Public Oncology Hospital During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Adherence to coprescribing of laxatives with opioids and associated characteristics in general practices in the Netherlands.BMC primary care · 2022Observational
- The principles of person-centredness in quality patient care-Evaluation of the Community Pharmacy Services Quality Guidelines in Estonia.The International journal of health planning and management · 2022Article
- Public views of community pharmacy services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2022Article
- Development and consensus testing of quality indicators for geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care using a modified Delphi study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022Article
- Prescriptions as quality indicators of pharmaceutical services in Polish community pharmacies.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Defining clinical pharmacy and support activities indicators for hospital practice using a combined nominal and focus group technique.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Do European pharmacists really have to trespass on medicine?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021Article
- Deprescribing in the Older Patient: A Narrative Review of Challenges and Solutions.International journal of general medicine · 2021Review
- Community and hospital pharmacists in Europe: encroaching on medicine?Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Article
- Non-dispensing pharmacist integrated in the primary care team: effect on the quality of physician's prescribing, a non-randomised comparative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020Article
- Evaluating Pharmacist's Patient Care Process in Shiraz, using a newly-validated questionnaire: The First Report from Iran.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The quality of pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies in the Netherlands has been assessed annually since 2008. The initial set has been further developed with pharmacists and patient organizations, the healthcare inspectorate, the government and health insurance companies. The set over 2012 was the first set of quality indicators for community pharmacies which was validated and supported by all major stakeholders. The aims of this study were to describe the validated set of quality indicators for community pharmacies and to report their scores over 2012. In subanalyses the score development over 5 years was described for those indicators, that have been surveyed before and remained unchanged. Methods Community pharmacists in the Netherlands were invited in 2013 to provide information for the set of 2012. Quality indicators were mapped by categories relevant for pharmaceutical care and defined for structures, processes and dispensing outcomes. Scores for categorically-measured quality indicators were presented as the percentage of pharmacies reporting the presence of a quality aspect. For numerical quality indicators, the mean of all reported scores was expressed. In subanalyses for those indicators that had been questioned previously, scores were collected from earlier measurements for pharmacies providing their scores in 2012. Multilevel analysis was used to assess the consistency of scores within one pharmacy over time by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results For the set in 2012, 1739 Dutch community pharmacies (88 % of the total) provided information for 66 quality indicators in 10 categories. Indicator scores on the presence of quality structures showed relatively high quality levels. Scores for processes and dispensing outcomes were lower. Subanalyses showed that overall indicators scores improved within pharmacies, but this development differed between pharmacies. Conclusions A set of validated quality indicators provided insight into the quality of pharmaceutical care in the Netherlands. The quality of pharmaceutical care improved over time. As of 2012 quality structures were present in at least 80 % of the community pharmacies. Variation in scores on care processes and outcomes between individual pharmacies and over time can initiate future research to better understand and facilitate quality improvement in community pharmacies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.