ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016
Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing - evidence from a pan-European survey.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic literature review of health consumer attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on privacy, trust, and transparency.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Community Comfort With Automatic Sharing of Race, Ethnicity, and Language Data Between Health Care Settings: Cross-Sectional Study.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Sharing health data for research purposes: results of a population survey in Germany.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Exploring the Italian Population's attitudes toward health data sharing for healthcare purpose and scientific research: a cross-sectional study.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Public Preferences for Digital Health Data Sharing: Discrete Choice Experiment Study in 12 European Countries.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- The Role of Pain Catastrophizing, Emotional Intelligence, and Pain Intensity in the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients with Chronic Pain.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2023Article
- Exploring patient perspectives on the secondary use of their personal health information: an interview study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Is there a "pandemic effect" on individuals' willingness to take genetic tests?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- Article
- Patient consent preferences on sharing personal health information during the COVID-19 pandemic: "the more informed we are, the more likely we are to help".BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- Patients' and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence.Journal of medical ethics · 2022Review
- Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Trust and Trade-Offs in Sharing Data for Precision Medicine: A National Survey of Singapore.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Review
- The use of personal health information outside the circle of care: consent preferences of patients from an academic health care institution.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Self-Quantification Systems to Support Physical Activity: From Theory to Implementation Principles.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- "Who is watching the watchdog?": ethical perspectives of sharing health-related data for precision medicine in Singapore.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Digital health and care in pandemic times: impact of COVID-19.BMJ health & care informatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the public's preferences regarding potential privacy threats from devices or services storing health-related personal data. MATERIALS AND
methodsA pan-European survey based on a stated-preference experiment for assessing preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing.
resultsWe obtained 20 882 survey responses (94 606 preferences) from 27 EU member countries. Respondents recognized the benefits of storing electronic health information, with 75.5%, 63.9%, and 58.9% agreeing that storage was important for improving treatment quality, preventing epidemics, and reducing delays, respectively. Concerns about different levels of access by third parties were expressed by 48.9% to 60.6% of respondents.On average, compared to devices or systems that only store basic health status information, respondents preferred devices that also store identification data (coefficient/relative preference 95% CI = 0.04 [0.00-0.08], P = 0.034) and information on lifelong health conditions (coefficient = 0.13 [0.08 to 0.18], P < 0.001), but there was no evidence of this for devices with information on sensitive health conditions such as mental and sexual health and addictions (coefficient = -0.03 [-0.09 to 0.02], P = 0.24). Respondents were averse to their immediate family (coefficient = -0.05 [-0.05 to -0.01], P = 0.011) and home care nurses (coefficient = -0.06 [-0.11 to -0.02], P = 0.004) viewing this data, and strongly averse to health insurance companies (coefficient = -0.43 [-0.52 to 0.34], P < 0.001), private sector pharmaceutical companies (coefficient = -0.82 [-0.99 to -0.64], P < 0.001), and academic researchers (coefficient = -0.53 [-0.66 to -0.40], P < 0.001) viewing the data.
conclusionsStoring more detailed electronic health data was generally preferred, but respondents were averse to wider access to and sharing of this information. When developing frameworks for the use of electronic health data, policy makers should consider approaches that both highlight the benefits to the individual and minimize the perception of privacy risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.