Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27107439›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2017

The pharmacist and the EHR.

Scott D Nelson, John Poikonen, Thomas Reese, David El Halta, Charlene Weir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The importance of pharmacist engagement in diagnostic stewardship.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scott D NelsonPrincipal Domain Specialist, EHR Portfolio, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA scott.nelson@vanderbilt.edu.
John PoikonenDirector of Informatics, Avhana Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Thomas ReeseResearch Associate, Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
David El HaltaInformatics Pharmacist, University of Utah Hospital and Clinics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Charlene WeirResearch Professor, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Research Associate Professor, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) across the United States has impacted the methods by which health care professionals care for their patients. It is not always recognized, however, that pharmacists also actively use advanced functionality within the EHR. As critical members of the health care team, pharmacists utilize many different features of the EHR. The literature focuses on 3 main roles: documentation, medication reconciliation, and patient evaluation and monitoring. As health information technology proliferates, it is imperative that pharmacists' workflow and information needs are met within the EHR to optimize medication therapy quality, team communication, and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPharmacistsDocumentationDrug MonitoringHumansMedication ReconciliationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27107439
PMCPMC7654075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.