ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016
Automated identification of molecular effects of drugs (AIMED).
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Medicine in Neoplasms: A Systematic Review.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- OncoCTMiner: streamlining precision oncology trial matching via molecular profile analysis.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Article
- Causal feature selection using a knowledge graph combining structured knowledge from the biomedical literature and ontologies: A use case studying depression as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Discovering novel drug-supplement interactions using SuppKG generated from the biomedical literature.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2022Article
- Natural Language Processing-Assisted Literature Retrieval and Analysis for Combination Therapy in Cancer.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2022Article
- Rate of change in investigational treatment options: An analysis of reports from a large precision oncology decision support effort.International journal of medical informatics · 2020Article
- A Knowledge Graph of Combined Drug Therapies Using Semantic Predications From Biomedical Literature: Algorithm Development.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Applying citizen science to gene, drug and disease relationship extraction from biomedical abstracts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Exploring Novel Computable Knowledge in Structured Drug Product Labels.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020Article
- OCTANE: Oncology Clinical Trial Annotation Engine.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2019Article
- Rapamycin - mTOR + BRAF = ? Using relational similarity to find therapeutically relevant drug-gene relationships in unstructured text.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2019Article
- Article
- "Personalized Cancer Therapy": A Publicly Available Precision Oncology Resource.Cancer research · 2017Article
- Precision medicine informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGenomic profiling information is frequently available to oncologists, enabling targeted cancer therapy. Because clinically relevant information is rapidly emerging in the literature and elsewhere, there is a need for informatics technologies to support targeted therapies. To this end, we have developed a system for Automated Identification of Molecular Effects of Drugs, to help biomedical scientists curate this literature to facilitate decision support.
objectivesTo create an automated system to identify assertions in the literature concerning drugs targeting genes with therapeutic implications and characterize the challenges inherent in automating this process in rapidly evolving domains.
methodsWe used subject-predicate-object triples (semantic predications) and co-occurrence relations generated by applying the SemRep Natural Language Processing system to MEDLINE abstracts and ClinicalTrials.gov descriptions. We applied customized semantic queries to find drugs targeting genes of interest. The results were manually reviewed by a team of experts.
resultsCompared to a manually curated set of relationships, recall, precision, and F2 were 0.39, 0.21, and 0.33, respectively, which represents a 3- to 4-fold improvement over a publically available set of predications (SemMedDB) alone. Upon review of ostensibly false positive results, 26% were considered relevant additions to the reference set, and an additional 61% were considered to be relevant for review. Adding co-occurrence data improved results for drugs in early development, but not their better-established counterparts.
conclusionsPrecision medicine poses unique challenges for biomedical informatics systems that help domain experts find answers to their research questions. Further research is required to improve the performance of such systems, particularly for drugs in development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.