Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27107148›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2016

The feminine ideal and transactional sex: Navigating respectability and risk in Swaziland.

Rebecca Fielding-Miller, Kristin L Dunkle, Nwabisa Jama-Shai, Michael Windle, Craig Hadley, Hannah L F Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Contextual drivers of HIV risk among young African women.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2019
    Article
  11. Improving the Measurement of Transactional Sex in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Critical Review.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca Fielding-MillerUniversity of California, San Diego, 9500 Gillman Drive #0507, San Diego, CA 92093, United States. Electronic address: rfieldingmiller@ucsd.edu.
Kristin L DunkleSouth African Medical Research Council, 1 Soutpansberg Road, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Nwabisa Jama-ShaiSouth African Medical Research Council, 1 Soutpansberg Road, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
Michael WindleEmory University, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
Craig HadleyEmory University, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
Hannah L F CooperEmory University, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
Training Program in Substance Use, HIV and Related InfectionsT32DA023356 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Natasha Martin, Steffanie A Strathdee · 2007 to 2026
$7.8M
Ethical collaborations between substance abuse researchers and community groupsR21DA039782 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DAVIDSON, PETER JOHN · 2015 to 2016
$440k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA039782NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA023356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women who engage in transactional sex are not only at increased risk of HIV and intimate partner violence, but also face social risks including gossip and ostracism. These social and physical risks may be dependent on both what a woman expects and needs from her partner and how her community perceives the relationship. Gender theory suggests that some of these social risks may hinge on whether or not a woman's relationship threatens dominant masculinity. We conducted a qualitative study in Swaziland from September 2013 to October 2014 to explore transactional sex and respectable femininity through the lens of hegemonic gender theory. Using cultural consensus modeling, we identified cultural models of transactional sex and conducted 16 in-depth interviews with model key informants and 3 focus group discussions, for a total of 41 participants. We identified 4 main models of transactional relationships: One typified by marriage and high social respectability, a second in which women aspire towards marriage, a third particular to University students, and a fourth "sugar daddy" model. Women in all models expected and received significant financial support from their male partners. However, women in less respectable relationships risked social censure and stigma if they were discovered, in part because aspects of their relationship threatened hegemonic masculinity. Conversely, women who received male support in respectable relationships had to carefully select HIV risk reduction strategies that did not threaten their relationship and associated social status. Research and programming efforts typically focus only on the less socially respectable forms of transactional sex. This risks reinforcing stigma for women in relationships that are already considered socially unacceptable while ignoring the unique HIV risks faced by women in more respectable relationships.

Indexed as

Psychological DistanceSocial StigmaAdultEswatiniFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorSex WorkCultural consensus modelFemininityGender hegemonyHIVSwazilandTransactional sex

Identifiers

PMID27107148
PMCPMC4875790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.