ArticleThe oncologist2016
Evaluating the Utility of Baseline Cardiac Function Screening in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treatment.
Article in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The cancer patient and cardiology.European journal of heart failure · 2020Review
- Partnering Teams to Optimize the Care of Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.JACC. CardioOncology · 2020Article
- HER2+ breast cancer treatment and cardiotoxicity: monitoring and management.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019Review
- Cardiotoxicity of Targeted Cancer Drugs: Concerns, "The Cart Before the Horse," and Lessons from Trastuzumab.Current cardiology reports · 2019Review
- Cancer treatment-related cardiac toxicity: prevention, assessment and management.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiotoxicity can be a complication of anthracycline- or trastuzumab-based therapy for breast cancer patients. Screening echocardiograms (ECHOs) and radionuclide ventriculograms (RVGs) are often performed before administration of these agents to evaluate cardiac function. Limited evidence for the clinical utility of these screening tests is available.
methodsEarly-stage breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2011 (n = 1,067) with baseline ECHOs/RVGs were identified in a single institution prospective registry. Medical record review was performed to obtain pre- and post-ECHO/RVG treatment plans, baseline ECHO/RVG results, cardiac risk factors, and cardiac events. Patients with cardiac history were excluded. ECHO/RVG abnormalities were defined as ejection fraction (EF) <55%, valvular disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and diastolic dysfunction. Cardiac events were defined as heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, valvular disease, or angina during or after chemotherapy.
resultsAmong 600 eligible patients, abnormal ECHO/RVG results were observed in 13 (2.2%, 1.2%-3.7%), including 9 with baseline EF <55%. There were no detected changes in treatment plans, although more frequent cardiac monitoring was recommended for 2 patients. There were no significant differences in age, race, menopausal status, smoking history, alcohol use, body mass index, or medical comorbidities between patients with abnormal and normal results. In follow-up (mean, 4.0 years; range, 0-8.3), 15 patients developed cardiac events (none of whom had had abnormal baseline ECHOs/RVGs).
conclusionBaseline ECHO/RVG in patients without prior cardiac history rarely yields an abnormality that prompts change in planned anthracycline- and/or trastuzumab-based treatment. Moreover, few cardiac events developed in this screened population in follow-up. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Baseline cardiac function screening with echocardiograms or radionuclide ventriculograms is frequently performed before administration of anthracycline- or trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients due to the relatively low cost and risk to patients and the concern for potential cardiotoxicity. However, at a population level, these tests can take up time and can add up to significant costs for both patients and the health care system. This study finds that in patients with no history of cardiac disease, baseline cardiac function screening rarely identifies abnormalities that change treatment plans. Moreover, few cardiac events develop in an average of 4 years of follow-up, including none in patients with abnormal baseline cardiac function screening results. This suggests that baseline cardiac function screening may have limited utility in chemotherapy planning in young breast cancer patients with no history of cardiac disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.