Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27106926›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Knee joint distraction compared with high tibial osteotomy: a randomized controlled trial.

J A D van der Woude, K Wiegant, R J van Heerwaarden, S Spruijt, P M van Roermund, R J H Custers, S C Mastbergen, F P J G Lafeber

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Surgical interventions for symptomatic mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J A D van der WoudeLimb and Knee Reconstruction Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maartenskliniek Woerden, Woerden, The Netherlands.
K WiegantRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, F02.217, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R J van HeerwaardenLimb and Knee Reconstruction Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maartenskliniek Woerden, Woerden, The Netherlands.
S SpruijtLimb and Knee Reconstruction Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maartenskliniek Woerden, Woerden, The Netherlands.
P M van RoermundDepartment of Orthopedics, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R J H CustersDepartment of Orthopedics, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S C MastbergenRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, F02.217, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
F P J G LafeberRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, F02.217, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. f.lafeber@umcutrecht.nl.
Sint Maartenskliniek · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBoth, knee joint distraction as a relatively new approach and valgus-producing opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO), are knee-preserving treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA). The efficacy of knee joint distraction compared to HTO has not been reported.

methodsSixty-nine patients with medial knee joint OA with a varus axis deviation of <10° were randomized to either knee joint distraction (n = 23) or HTO (n = 46). Questionnaires were assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Joint space width (JSW) as a surrogate measure for cartilage thickness was determined on standardized semi-flexed radiographs at baseline and 1-year follow-up.

resultsAll patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) improved significantly over 1 year (at 1 year p < 0.02) in both groups. At 1 year, the HTO group showed slightly greater improvement in 4 of the 16 PROMS (p < 0.05). The minimum medial compartment JSW increased 0.8 ± 1.0 mm in the knee joint distraction group (p = 0.001) and 0.4 ± 0.5 mm in the HTO group (p < 0.001), with minimum JSW improvement in favour of knee joint distraction (p = 0.05). The lateral compartment showed a small increase in the knee joint distraction group and a small decrease in the HTO group, leading to a significant increase in mean JSW for knee joint distraction only (p < 0.02).

conclusionCartilaginous repair activity, as indicated by JSW, and clinical outcome improvement occurred with both, knee joint distraction and HTO. These findings suggest that knee joint distraction may be an alternative therapy for medial compartmental OA with a limited mechanical leg malalignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Randomized controlled trial, Level I.

Indexed as

OsteotomyTractionExternal FixatorsFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeRadiographyRange of Motion, ArticularTibiaTreatment OutcomeCartilage repairHigh tibial osteotomyJoint distractionKnee osteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID27106926
PMCPMC5332499
OpenAlexW1709048971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.