Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27106898›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2016

Cell Cycle Regulation and Melanoma.

Wen Xu, Grant McArthur

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Upregulated expression ofJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. BRAF Gene and Melanoma: Back to the Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wen XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia.
Grant McArthurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia. grant.mcarthur@petermac.org.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysregulation of cell cycle control is a hallmark of melanomagenesis. Agents targeting the G1-S and G2-M checkpoints, as well as direct anti-mitotic agents, have all shown promising preclinical activity in melanoma. However, in vivo, standalone single agents targeting cell cycle regulation have only demonstrated modest efficacy in unselected patients. The advent of specific CDK 4/6 inhibitors targeting the G1-S transition, with an improved therapeutic index, is a significant step forward. Potential synergy exists with the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with existing therapies targeting the MAPK pathway, particularly in subsets of metastatic melanomas such as NRAS and BRAF mutants. This reviews summaries of the latest developments in both preclinical and clinical data with cell cycle-targeted therapies in melanoma.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell CycleCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4HumansMelanomaSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Anti-mitotic agentsCDK4/6 inhibitorsCell cycle regulationChk1G1-S checkpointG2-M checkpointMetastatic melanomaMK2WEE1

Identifiers

PMID27106898
OpenAlexW2337488576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.