Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27106880›Full record

Trial reportWestern journal of nursing research2016

Racial Differences in Program Evaluation of a Lifestyle Physical Activity Randomized Controlled Trial.

Fawn A Cothran, Olimpia Paun, Carol J Farran, Lisa L Barnes

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Western journal of nursing research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fawn A CothranAdult Health and Gerontological Nursing, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA Fawn_Cothran@rush.edu.
Olimpia PaunCommunity, Systems, and Mental Health Nursing, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA.
Carol J FarranAdult Health and Gerontological Nursing, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lisa L BarnesRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, and Departments of Neurological Sciences and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Clinical Trial to Enhance Caregiver Physical ActivityR01NR009543 · NINR · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI FARRAN, CAROL J. · 2007 to 2011
$3.2M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR009543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare program evaluation responses between African American and Caucasian caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias who completed a lifestyle physical activity randomized controlled trial. The aim was to determine if African Americans evaluated the study differently than Caucasians. Family caregivers (N = 211) were randomly assigned to a 12-month physical activity intervention or a control condition. Upon intervention completion (n = 114), caregivers responded to an 11-item questionnaire using Likert-type scale responses and three open-ended questions about the overall intervention quality. Findings indicated that African American caregivers evaluated both conditions more favorably than Caucasian caregivers (p = .02). Content analysis of the narrative responses revealed five major qualitative themes: support, resources, responsibility, adjusting, and time These findings suggest the value of both access to resources, and support for African American caregivers who participate in intervention research.

Indexed as

ExerciseLife StyleProgram EvaluationRacial GroupsBlack or African AmericanCaregiversDementiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesWhite PeopleAfrican Americandementia caregivingprogram evaluation

Identifiers

PMID27106880
PMCPMC5033672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.